Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Palau

Palau: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) was 52.36 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
52.36
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
139th
of 191 countries
All-time high
52.36
in 2014
All-time low
52.36
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Palau, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 52.42015: 52.42016: 52.42017: 52.42018: 52.42019: 52.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Palau is 52.36, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Palau 139th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Palau, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Palau, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 52.36 —
2015 52.36 +0.0%
2016 52.36 +0.0%
2017 52.36 +0.0%
2018 52.36 +0.0%
2019 52.36 +0.0%

Palau compared with similar countries

  • Palau's 52.36 is below the median for high income countries, which is 77.24, 68% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Palau's 52.36 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 69.26, 76% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Palau

  1. 136 Ghana 53.77 compare
  2. 137 Somalia 53.3 compare
  3. 138 Trinidad and Tobago 52.97 compare
  4. 140 Bahamas 51.7 compare
  5. 141 Antigua and Barbuda 48.45 compare
  6. 142 Senegal 48.42 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Palau

All data for Palau →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Palau?
Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Palau was 52.36 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Palau?
The highest recorded value was 52.36 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Palau?
The lowest recorded value was 52.36 in 2014.
How does Palau rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
Palau ranks 139th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Palau?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Palau data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Palau. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/palau/">Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Palau</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.