Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Mexico?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Mexico data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Mexico

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Mexico
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Mexico: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 62.26 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

62.26

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

117th

of 188 countries

All-time high

62.26

in 2014

All-time low

62.26

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Mexico, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Mexico is 62.26, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Mexico ranks 117th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Mexico

114 Qatar 63.99 compare
115 Puerto Rico 63.61 compare
116 Niger 63.13 compare
118 Bangladesh 61.49 compare
119 Iran 60.81 compare
120 Kiribati 60.38 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Mexico

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.11 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 16.66 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 32.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.75 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 32.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.78 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 84.69 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 157.18 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.55 (2050)

All data for Mexico →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Mexico?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Mexico was 62.26 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Mexico?: The highest recorded value was 62.26 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Mexico?: The lowest recorded value was 62.26 in 2014.
How does Mexico rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Mexico ranks 117th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Mexico?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mexico data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.