Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Lesotho?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Lesotho data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Lesotho

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Lesotho
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Lesotho: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 85.85 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

85.85

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

47th

of 188 countries

All-time high

85.85

in 2014

All-time low

85.85

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Lesotho, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Lesotho is 85.85, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Lesotho 47th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Lesotho

44 Eswatini 87.32 compare
45 Laos 86.79 compare
46 Kenya 86.56 compare
47 Argentina 85.85 compare
47 Israel 85.85 compare
47 Latvia 85.85 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Lesotho

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.582 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0331 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5388 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.582 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0101 (2050)
Temperature anomalies by month 0.6724 °C (2026)
Spring temperature anomalies 0.6457 °C (2026)
Summer temperature anomalies 1.77 °C (2026)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 49.46 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.06 (2050)

All data for Lesotho →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Lesotho?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Lesotho was 85.85 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Lesotho?: The highest recorded value was 85.85 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Lesotho?: The lowest recorded value was 85.85 in 2014.
How does Lesotho rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Lesotho ranks 47th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Lesotho?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Lesotho data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.