Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Germany?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Germany data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Germany

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Germany
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Germany: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 67.45 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

67.45

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

103rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

67.45

in 2014

All-time low

67.45

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Germany, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Germany recorded 67.45 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Germany 103rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Germany

100 Turkey 68.11 compare
101 Brunei 67.92 compare
101 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 67.92 compare
104 East Timor 66.98 compare
105 Benin 66.57 compare
106 Iceland 65.57 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Germany

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.6 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.7 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.93 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.93 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 15.41 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 9.96 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.87 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 80.38 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 10.56 (2050)

All data for Germany →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Germany?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Germany was 67.45 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Germany?: The highest recorded value was 67.45 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Germany?: The lowest recorded value was 67.45 in 2014.
How does Germany rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Germany ranks 103rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Germany?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Germany data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.