Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Georgia

Georgia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) was 89.43 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
89.43
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
41st
of 191 countries
All-time high
89.43
in 2014
All-time low
89.43
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Georgia, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 89.42015: 89.42016: 89.42017: 89.42018: 89.42019: 89.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Georgia recorded 89.43 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Georgia 41st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Georgia, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Georgia, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 89.43 —
2015 89.43 +0.0%
2016 89.43 +0.0%
2017 89.43 +0.0%
2018 89.43 +0.0%
2019 89.43 +0.0%

Georgia compared with similar countries

  • Georgia's 89.43 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 69.12, 1.3× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Georgia's 89.43 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 93.87, 95% of the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Georgia

  1. 38 Kosovo 90.09 compare
  2. 38 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 90.09 compare
  3. 40 Burundi 89.73 compare
  4. 42 Switzerland 89.15 compare
  5. 43 Norway 88.21 compare
  6. 44 El Salvador 87.89 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Georgia

All data for Georgia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Georgia?
Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Georgia was 89.43 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Georgia?
The highest recorded value was 89.43 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Georgia?
The lowest recorded value was 89.43 in 2014.
How does Georgia rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
Georgia ranks 41st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Georgia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Georgia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Georgia. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/georgia/">Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Georgia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.