Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Gambia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Gambia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Gambia

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Gambia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Gambia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 64.1 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

64.1

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

113th

of 188 countries

All-time high

64.1

in 2014

All-time low

64.1

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Gambia, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Gambia recorded 64.1 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Gambia 113th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Gambia

111 Tunisia 64.64 compare
112 Cambodia 64.62 compare
114 Qatar 63.99 compare
115 Puerto Rico 63.61 compare
116 Niger 63.13 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Gambia

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 10.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2798 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.68 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3524 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.72 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0331 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0044 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1264 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 455.59 (2050)

All data for Gambia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Gambia?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Gambia was 64.1 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Gambia?: The highest recorded value was 64.1 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Gambia?: The lowest recorded value was 64.1 in 2014.
How does Gambia rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Gambia ranks 113th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Gambia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Gambia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.