Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Finland?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Finland data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Finland

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Finland
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Finland: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 79.95 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

79.95

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

63rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

79.95

in 2014

All-time low

79.95

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Finland, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Finland recorded 79.95 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Finland 63rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Finland

60 Uganda 80.25 compare
61 Indonesia 80.09 compare
62 India 80.01 compare
63 Malaysia 79.95 compare
65 Azerbaijan 79.8 compare
66 Thailand 79 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Finland

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2998 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1241 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.5 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1748 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.5 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6733 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6503 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9518 (2050)

All data for Finland →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Finland?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Finland was 79.95 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Finland?: The highest recorded value was 79.95 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Finland?: The lowest recorded value was 79.95 in 2014.
How does Finland rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Finland ranks 63rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Finland?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Finland data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.