Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Brazil?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Brazil data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Brazil

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Brazil
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Brazil: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 18.68 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

18.68

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

170th

of 188 countries

All-time high

18.68

in 2014

All-time low

18.68

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Brazil, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Brazil recorded 18.68 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Brazil ranks 170th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Brazil

167 Nigeria 25.88 compare
168 Paraguay 23.11 compare
169 Angola 22.17 compare
171 Madagascar 18.14 compare
172 Jamaica 17.36 compare
173 Sudan 8.82 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Brazil

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Brazil?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Brazil was 18.68 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Brazil?: The highest recorded value was 18.68 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Brazil?: The lowest recorded value was 18.68 in 2014.
How does Brazil rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Brazil ranks 170th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Brazil?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Brazil data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.