Time to import (days) in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Time to import (days) was 73 DB06-15 methodology in 2014. ▬ Flat
Time to import (days) in Kyrgyzstan, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-15 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for time to import (days) in Kyrgyzstan is 73 DB06-15 methodology, measured in 2014.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.7% on the previous year and down 2.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time to import (days) in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 75 DB06-15 methodology in 2005 and was at its lowest, 72 DB06-15 methodology, in 2009.
That places Kyrgyzstan 6th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top 10%.
Time to import (days) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | DB06-15 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 75 DB06-15 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 75 DB06-15 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 75 DB06-15 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 75 DB06-15 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 72 DB06-15 methodology | -4.0% |
| 2010 | 72 DB06-15 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 72 DB06-15 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 75 DB06-15 methodology | +4.2% |
| 2013 | 75 DB06-15 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 73 DB06-15 methodology | -2.7% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 73 DB06-15 methodology is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 27 DB06-15 methodology, 2.7× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 73 DB06-15 methodology is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 13.5 DB06-15 methodology, 5.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.4 DB06-15 methodology | 72 DB06-15 methodology | 75 DB06-15 methodology | 5 |
| 2010s | 73.4 DB06-15 methodology | 72 DB06-15 methodology | 75 DB06-15 methodology | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2833 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0857 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8535 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4667 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time to import (days) in Kyrgyzstan?
- Time to import (days) in Kyrgyzstan was 73 DB06-15 methodology in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest time to import (days) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 75 DB06-15 methodology in 2005.
- What is the lowest time to import (days) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 72 DB06-15 methodology in 2009.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for time to import (days)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is time to import (days) rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The time to import records the time associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calulcated in calendar days. The time calculation for each of the 4 predefined stages starts from the moment the stage is initiated and runs until it is completed. Fast-track procedures applying only to certain accredited firms under authorized economic operator programs are not taken into account because they are not available to all trading companies. Sea transport time is not included. It is assumed that neither the exporter nor the importer wastes time and that each commits to completing the process without delay. It is assumed that document preparation, inland transport and handling, customs clearance and inspections, and port and terminal handling require a minimum time of 1 day each and cannot take place simultaneously. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.