Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP was 0 number per US$ of GDP in 2013. ▲ Rising
Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe, 1973–2013
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in number per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2013, teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe stood at 0 number per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 28 years on record.
The figure is down 13.5% on the previous year and down 67.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe peaked at 0 number per US$ of GDP in 1985 and was at its lowest, 0 number per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 193 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 28 years of available data.
Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | number per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1973 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1974 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 1975 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 1976 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 1977 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 1978 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +3.5% |
| 1979 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -31.6% |
| 1981 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +27.0% |
| 1982 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +9.4% |
| 1983 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +26.0% |
| 1984 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +22.5% |
| 1985 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +13.6% |
| 1986 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1987 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -8.8% |
| 1988 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
| 1989 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -4.0% |
| 1990 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 1991 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 1992 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +32.1% |
| 1995 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1996 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1999 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +10.8% |
| 2000 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +11.3% |
| 2001 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -0.9% |
| 2002 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2003 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +8.7% |
| 2012 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -62.8% |
| 2013 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 0 number per US$ of GDP is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 number per US$ of GDP, 2.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 0 number per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 number per US$ of GDP, 90% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 7 |
| 1980s | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1990s | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 6 |
| 2000s | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 4 |
| 2010s | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 2 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More reference data data for Zimbabwe
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Political opposition, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament and government, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled 0 events (2024)
- Annual precipitation, annual growth rate 122.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Free country, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, gaps filled 5 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe?
- Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe was 0 number per US$ of GDP in 2013, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0 number per US$ of GDP in 1985.
- What is the lowest teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 number per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp?
- Zimbabwe ranks 31st out of 193 countries with data for 2013.
- Is teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 67.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 28 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Teachers in primary education, male (number) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Teachers in primary education, male (number) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Teachers in primary education, male UNESCO Institute for Statistics
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Teachers in primary education, male (number) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.