Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP in Latvia
Latvia: Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP was 0 number per US$ of GDP in 2018. ◆ Volatile
Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP in Latvia, 1995–2018
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in number per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp in Latvia is 0 number per US$ of GDP, measured in 2018.
That represents a change of down 9.9% on the previous year and up 12.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp in Latvia peaked at 0 number per US$ of GDP in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0 number per US$ of GDP, in 2006.
Latvia ranks 149th of 193 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP in Latvia, year by year
| Year | number per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -58.7% |
| 1997 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +32.6% |
| 1998 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -42.3% |
| 1999 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 2000 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 2001 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 2002 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -23.1% |
| 2003 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 2004 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -29.8% |
| 2005 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 2006 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 2007 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +122.6% |
| 2008 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 2009 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +35.9% |
| 2010 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 2011 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2012 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -0.8% |
| 2013 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 2014 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +4.2% |
| 2015 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | +17.1% |
| 2016 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 2017 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2018 | 0 number per US$ of GDP | -9.9% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0 number per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 number per US$ of GDP, 1.2× the median. (71 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0 number per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 number per US$ of GDP, 1.2× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | +122.6% | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 0 number per US$ of GDP | 9 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp in Latvia?
- Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp in Latvia was 0 number per US$ of GDP in 2018, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 number per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- What is the lowest teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 number per US$ of GDP in 2006.
- How does Latvia rank for teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 149th out of 193 countries with data for 2018.
- Is teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Teachers in primary education, male (number), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Teachers in primary education, male (number) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Teachers in primary education, male (number) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Teachers in primary education, male UNESCO Institute for Statistics
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Teachers in primary education, male (number) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.