Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa: Sustainable Economic Opportunity was 45.66 in 2011. ▲ Rising

Latest (2011)
45.66
Change on year
up 0.4%
Rank
6th
of 6 groups
All-time high
45.66
in 2011
All-time low
40.04
in 2000
Years of data
12
2000–2011

Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa, 2000–2011

010203040502000200520112000: 402001: 40.32002: 40.32003: 40.52004: 40.62005: 41.42006: 42.42007: 432008: 44.12009: 44.72010: 45.52011: 45.7

Source: Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site.

Analysis

Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa recorded 45.66 for sustainable economic opportunity in 2011. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is up 0.4% on the previous year and up 13.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sustainable economic opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa peaked at 45.66 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 40.04, in 2000.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa, year by year

Annual values for Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa, 2000 to 2011.
Year Value Change
2000 40.04
2001 40.27 +0.6%
2002 40.32 +0.1%
2003 40.47 +0.4%
2004 40.57 +0.3%
2005 41.42 +2.1%
2006 42.44 +2.5%
2007 42.97 +1.3%
2008 44.14 +2.7%
2009 44.71 +1.3%
2010 45.48 +1.7%
2011 45.66 +0.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 41.74 40.04 44.71 10
2010s 45.57 45.48 45.66 2

Countries ranked near Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa

  1. 3 Egypt 68.25 compare
  2. 4 Cape Verde 68.15 compare
  3. 5 Botswana 67.96 compare
  4. 6 Morocco 64.53 compare
  5. 7 Seychelles 63.74 compare
  6. 8 South Africa 61.56 compare
  7. 9 Namibia 61.14 compare

See the full ranking of 58 places →

More reference data data for Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa

All data for Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is sustainable economic opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
Sustainable economic opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa was 45.66 in 2011, according to Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site.
What is the highest sustainable economic opportunity recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 45.66 in 2011.
What is the lowest sustainable economic opportunity recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 40.04 in 2000.
How does Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa rank for sustainable economic opportunity?
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ranks 6th out of 6 groups with data for 2011.
Is sustainable economic opportunity rising or falling in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 13.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa data come from?
The figures come from Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as part of Sustainable Economic Opportunity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa. Statizoid, drawing on Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/sustainable-economic-opportunity/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/sustainable-economic-opportunity/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa/">Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sustainable Economic Opportunity
Source
Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
58 places, 696 data points, 2000–2011
Last refreshed

Public Management: Within this subcategory the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Quality of Public Administration – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which the civil service is structured to effectively and ethically design policy and deliver services. (ii) Quality of Budget Management – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which there is a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities, with mechanisms to ensure implementation and reporting. (iii) Currency Inside Banks – total stock of currency held within banks as a proportion of the money supply in an economy (OD). (iv) Ratio of Total Revenue to Total Expenditure – total budget revenue as a proportion of total budget expenditure (OD). (v) Ratio of Budget Deficit or Surplus to GDP – budget deficit or budget surplus as a proportion of Gross Domestic Product. (vi) Management of Public Debt – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring short- and medium term sustainability of fiscal policy and its impact on growth. (vii) Inflation – annual average change in the consumer price index. (viii) Ratio of External Debt Service to Exports – total external debt service due, expressed as a proportion of exports of goods, non-factor services, income and workers’ remittances. (ix) Imports Covered by Reserves – period of time that imports could be paid for by foreign exchange reserves. (x) Statistical Capacity – national statistical systems and their adherence to international norms in the areas of: Methodology (of compiling statistics and indicators); Regularity and coverage of censuses and surveys; Regularity, timeliness and accessibility of key socioeconomic indicators.