Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Djibouti
Djibouti: Sustainable Economic Opportunity was 49.16 in 2011. ▬ Flat
Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Djibouti, 2000–2011
Source: Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site.
Analysis
In 2011, sustainable economic opportunity in Djibouti stood at 49.16. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is up 3.2% on the previous year and up 3.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sustainable economic opportunity in Djibouti peaked at 49.16 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 42.42, in 2008.
Djibouti ranks 24th of 52 regions on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.18 | 42.42 | 47.34 | 10 |
| 2010s | 48.39 | 47.62 | 49.16 | 2 |
Countries ranked near Djibouti
More reference data data for Djibouti
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.3377 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -0.0948 °C (2026)
- Spring temperature anomalies 0.3234 °C (2026)
- Consumer price index 134.49 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 1.13 °C (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 0.3443 °C (2025)
- Competitive elections 0 (2025)
- Free country 0 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating 5 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sustainable economic opportunity in Djibouti?
- Sustainable economic opportunity in Djibouti was 49.16 in 2011, according to Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site.
- What is the highest sustainable economic opportunity recorded in Djibouti?
- The highest recorded value was 49.16 in 2011.
- What is the lowest sustainable economic opportunity recorded in Djibouti?
- The lowest recorded value was 42.42 in 2008.
- How does Djibouti rank for sustainable economic opportunity?
- Djibouti ranks 24th out of 52 regions with data for 2011.
- Is sustainable economic opportunity rising or falling in Djibouti?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Djibouti data come from?
- The figures come from Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as part of Sustainable Economic Opportunity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Public Management: Within this subcategory the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Quality of Public Administration – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which the civil service is structured to effectively and ethically design policy and deliver services. (ii) Quality of Budget Management – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which there is a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities, with mechanisms to ensure implementation and reporting. (iii) Currency Inside Banks – total stock of currency held within banks as a proportion of the money supply in an economy (OD). (iv) Ratio of Total Revenue to Total Expenditure – total budget revenue as a proportion of total budget expenditure (OD). (v) Ratio of Budget Deficit or Surplus to GDP – budget deficit or budget surplus as a proportion of Gross Domestic Product. (vi) Management of Public Debt – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring short- and medium term sustainability of fiscal policy and its impact on growth. (vii) Inflation – annual average change in the consumer price index. (viii) Ratio of External Debt Service to Exports – total external debt service due, expressed as a proportion of exports of goods, non-factor services, income and workers’ remittances. (ix) Imports Covered by Reserves – period of time that imports could be paid for by foreign exchange reserves. (x) Statistical Capacity – national statistical systems and their adherence to international norms in the areas of: Methodology (of compiling statistics and indicators); Regularity and coverage of censuses and surveys; Regularity, timeliness and accessibility of key socioeconomic indicators.