Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Comoros
Comoros: Sustainable Economic Opportunity was 28.82 in 2011. ▬ Flat
Sustainable Economic Opportunity in Comoros, 2000–2011
Source: Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site.
Analysis
The most recent figure for sustainable economic opportunity in Comoros is 28.82, measured in 2011.
The figure is up 1.6% on the previous year and up 4.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sustainable economic opportunity in Comoros peaked at 29.97 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 27.02, in 2000.
That places Comoros 49th out of 52 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.34 | 27.02 | 29.97 | 10 |
| 2010s | 28.6 | 28.38 | 28.82 | 2 |
Countries ranked near Comoros
More reference data data for Comoros
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.5349 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month 0.3401 °C (2026)
- Spring temperature anomalies -0.0329 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Consumer price index 157.9 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Free country 1 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating 5 (2025)
- Democracy 3 (2025)
- Competitive elections 0 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sustainable economic opportunity in Comoros?
- Sustainable economic opportunity in Comoros was 28.82 in 2011, according to Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site.
- What is the highest sustainable economic opportunity recorded in Comoros?
- The highest recorded value was 29.97 in 2006.
- What is the lowest sustainable economic opportunity recorded in Comoros?
- The lowest recorded value was 27.02 in 2000.
- How does Comoros rank for sustainable economic opportunity?
- Comoros ranks 49th out of 52 countries with data for 2011.
- Is sustainable economic opportunity rising or falling in Comoros?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Comoros data come from?
- The figures come from Mo Ibrahim Foundation, electronic files and web site, published as part of Sustainable Economic Opportunity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Public Management: Within this subcategory the Ibrahim Index measures: (i) Quality of Public Administration – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which the civil service is structured to effectively and ethically design policy and deliver services. (ii) Quality of Budget Management – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring the extent to which there is a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities, with mechanisms to ensure implementation and reporting. (iii) Currency Inside Banks – total stock of currency held within banks as a proportion of the money supply in an economy (OD). (iv) Ratio of Total Revenue to Total Expenditure – total budget revenue as a proportion of total budget expenditure (OD). (v) Ratio of Budget Deficit or Surplus to GDP – budget deficit or budget surplus as a proportion of Gross Domestic Product. (vi) Management of Public Debt – clustered indicator (average) of variables from the African Development Bank and the World Bank measuring short- and medium term sustainability of fiscal policy and its impact on growth. (vii) Inflation – annual average change in the consumer price index. (viii) Ratio of External Debt Service to Exports – total external debt service due, expressed as a proportion of exports of goods, non-factor services, income and workers’ remittances. (ix) Imports Covered by Reserves – period of time that imports could be paid for by foreign exchange reserves. (x) Statistical Capacity – national statistical systems and their adherence to international norms in the areas of: Methodology (of compiling statistics and indicators); Regularity and coverage of censuses and surveys; Regularity, timeliness and accessibility of key socioeconomic indicators.