Support to help to quit tobacco use in Serbia
Serbia: Support to help to quit tobacco use was 4 in 2022. ▲ Rising
Latest (2022)
4
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
33rd
of 194 countries
All-time high
4
in 2010
All-time low
3
in 2007
Years of data
9
2007–2022
Support to help to quit tobacco use in Serbia, 2007–2022
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for support to help to quit tobacco use in Serbia is 4, measured in 2022. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, support to help to quit tobacco use in Serbia peaked at 4 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 3, in 2007.
That places Serbia 33rd out of 194 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
Support to help to quit tobacco use in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 3 | — |
| 2008 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 | +33.3% |
| 2012 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 4 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 4 | +0.0% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 4 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 4, 1.0× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 4 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4, 1.0× the median. (51 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 2010s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 2020s | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 33 Albania 4 compare
- 33 Andorra 4 compare
- 33 Angola 4 compare
- 33 Argentina 4 compare
- 33 Armenia 4 compare
- 33 Australia 4 compare
- 33 Bahamas 4 compare
- 33 Bahrain 4 compare
- 33 Barbados 4 compare
- 33 Belarus 4 compare
- 33 Belgium 4 compare
- 33 Belize 4 compare
- 33 Bhutan 4 compare
- 33 Bolivia 4 compare
- 33 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 compare
- 33 Botswana 4 compare
- 33 Brunei 4 compare
- 33 Bulgaria 4 compare
- 33 Cambodia 4 compare
- 33 Cameroon 4 compare
- 33 China 4 compare
- 33 Colombia 4 compare
- 33 Cote d'Ivoire 4 compare
- 33 Croatia 4 compare
- 33 Cuba 4 compare
- 33 Cyprus 4 compare
- 33 East Timor 4 compare
- 33 Ecuador 4 compare
- 33 Egypt 4 compare
- 33 El Salvador 4 compare
- 33 Estonia 4 compare
- 33 Eswatini 4 compare
- 33 Fiji 4 compare
- 33 Finland 4 compare
- 33 France 4 compare
- 33 Germany 4 compare
- 33 Ghana 4 compare
- 33 Greece 4 compare
- 33 Guatemala 4 compare
- 33 Guyana 4 compare
- 33 Honduras 4 compare
- 33 Hungary 4 compare
- 33 Indonesia 4 compare
- 33 Iraq 4 compare
- 33 Italy 4 compare
- 33 Japan 4 compare
- 33 Kazakhstan 4 compare
- 33 Kenya 4 compare
- 33 Kiribati 4 compare
- 33 Kyrgyzstan 4 compare
- 33 Latvia 4 compare
- 33 Lebanon 4 compare
- 33 Lesotho 4 compare
- 33 Libya 4 compare
- 33 Lithuania 4 compare
- 33 Malaysia 4 compare
- 33 Maldives 4 compare
- 33 Mali 4 compare
- 33 Malta 4 compare
- 33 Marshall Islands 4 compare
- 33 Mauritania 4 compare
- 33 Micronesia (country) 4 compare
- 33 Moldova 4 compare
- 33 Monaco 4 compare
- 33 Mongolia 4 compare
- 33 Mozambique 4 compare
- 33 Myanmar 4 compare
- 33 Namibia 4 compare
- 33 Nigeria 4 compare
- 33 Niue 4 compare
- 33 North Korea 4 compare
- 33 North Macedonia 4 compare
- 33 Norway 4 compare
- 33 Pakistan 4 compare
- 33 Palau 4 compare
- 33 Panama 4 compare
- 33 Paraguay 4 compare
- 33 Peru 4 compare
- 33 Poland 4 compare
- 33 Portugal 4 compare
- 33 Qatar 4 compare
- 33 Russia 4 compare
- 33 Saint Lucia 4 compare
- 33 Samoa 4 compare
- 33 Senegal 4 compare
- 33 Seychelles 4 compare
- 33 Slovenia 4 compare
- 33 Solomon Islands 4 compare
- 33 South Africa 4 compare
- 33 Spain 4 compare
- 33 Sri Lanka 4 compare
- 33 Sudan 4 compare
- 33 Switzerland 4 compare
- 33 Thailand 4 compare
- 33 Trinidad and Tobago 4 compare
- 33 Tunisia 4 compare
- 33 Turkmenistan 4 compare
- 33 United Kingdom 4 compare
- 33 Uruguay 4 compare
- 33 Uzbekistan 4 compare
- 33 Venezuela 4 compare
- 33 Vietnam 4 compare
- 33 Zimbabwe 4 compare
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is support to help to quit tobacco use in Serbia?
- Support to help to quit tobacco use in Serbia was 4 in 2022, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest support to help to quit tobacco use recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 4 in 2010.
- What is the lowest support to help to quit tobacco use recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 in 2007.
- How does Serbia rank for support to help to quit tobacco use?
- Serbia ranks 33rd out of 194 countries with data for 2022.
- Is support to help to quit tobacco use rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Support to help to quit tobacco use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).