State Capacity Index in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: State Capacity Index was -0.0795 in 2015. ◆ Volatile
State Capacity Index in Uzbekistan, 1991–2015
Source: Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Uzbekistan recorded -0.0795 for state capacity index in 2015.
The figure is up 28.7% on the previous year and up 78.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, state capacity index in Uzbekistan peaked at -0.0764 in 2010 and was at its lowest, -0.9682, in 1991.
That places Uzbekistan 131st out of 166 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
State Capacity Index in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | -0.9682 | — |
| 1992 | -0.7219 | -25.4% |
| 1993 | -0.1092 | -84.9% |
| 1994 | -0.3636 | +233.0% |
| 1995 | -0.2417 | -33.5% |
| 1996 | -0.078 | -67.7% |
| 1997 | -0.1635 | +109.5% |
| 1998 | -0.1161 | -29.0% |
| 1999 | -0.2366 | +103.8% |
| 2000 | -0.3351 | +41.6% |
| 2001 | -0.4031 | +20.3% |
| 2002 | -0.4348 | +7.9% |
| 2003 | -0.3492 | -19.7% |
| 2004 | -0.1543 | -55.8% |
| 2005 | -0.3733 | +141.9% |
| 2006 | -0.3419 | -8.4% |
| 2007 | -0.3421 | +0.1% |
| 2008 | -0.1347 | -60.6% |
| 2009 | -0.1682 | +24.9% |
| 2010 | -0.0764 | -54.6% |
| 2011 | -0.1191 | +56.0% |
| 2012 | -0.208 | +74.6% |
| 2013 | -0.0971 | -53.3% |
| 2014 | -0.1115 | +14.8% |
| 2015 | -0.0795 | -28.7% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's -0.0795 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.0123. (43 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's -0.0795 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.41. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3332 | -0.9682 | -0.078 | 9 |
| 2000s | -0.3037 | -0.4348 | -0.1347 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.1153 | -0.208 | -0.0764 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More reference data data for Uzbekistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2736 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 41.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.49 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is state capacity index in Uzbekistan?
- State capacity index in Uzbekistan was -0.0795 in 2015, according to Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest state capacity index recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0764 in 2010.
- What is the lowest state capacity index recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.9682 in 1991.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for state capacity index?
- Uzbekistan ranks 131st out of 166 countries with data for 2015.
- Is state capacity index rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 78.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Jonathan Hanson and Rachel Sigman (2021); Population based on various sources (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as part of State Capacity Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Measures state capacity by combining 21 different indicators related to three key dimensions: extractive capacity, coercive capacity, and administrative capacity. Higher values indicate greater state capacity.