Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP in Chile
Chile: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP was 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP in Chile, 1960–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Chile recorded 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp in 2024.
That represents a change of down 3.6% on the previous year and down 8.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp in Chile peaked at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, in 1962.
Chile ranks 12th of 210 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP in Chile, year by year
| Year | metric tons per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 1962 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1963 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 1964 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 1965 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +7.0% |
| 1966 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +63.3% |
| 1967 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -36.4% |
| 1968 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +24.6% |
| 1969 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 1970 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1971 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -2.5% |
| 1972 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +11.0% |
| 1973 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 1974 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +24.4% |
| 1975 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +160.2% |
| 1976 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 1977 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -18.1% |
| 1978 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +16.5% |
| 1979 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 1980 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +3.7% |
| 1981 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +12.3% |
| 1982 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +240.2% |
| 1983 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -64.6% |
| 1984 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +351.0% |
| 1985 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 1986 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +23.9% |
| 1987 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +19.1% |
| 1988 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +100.5% |
| 1989 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +38.5% |
| 1990 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +23.2% |
| 1991 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +30.6% |
| 1992 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1993 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 1994 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +18.2% |
| 1995 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -12.7% |
| 1996 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +47.2% |
| 1997 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +6.4% |
| 1998 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 1999 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 2000 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +34.2% |
| 2001 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +62.6% |
| 2002 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 2003 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 2004 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 2005 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -14.0% |
| 2006 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 2007 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 2008 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +3.6% |
| 2009 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 2010 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -35.9% |
| 2011 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +17.4% |
| 2012 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +4.4% |
| 2013 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2014 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +25.4% |
| 2015 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 2016 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 2017 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +4.9% |
| 2018 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -1.5% |
| 2019 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +16.2% |
| 2020 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +17.2% |
| 2021 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -22.8% |
| 2022 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +10.6% |
| 2023 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 2024 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp in Chile?
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp in Chile was 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 2001.
- What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 1962.
- How does Chile rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 12th out of 210 countries with data for 2024.
- Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.