Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square in Slovenia
Slovenia: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square was 0.0566 metric tons per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square in Slovenia, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square in Slovenia stood at 0.0566 metric tons per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 30.7% on the previous year and down 7.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square in Slovenia peaked at 0.1065 metric tons per square kilometre in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.0357 metric tons per square kilometre, in 1993.
That places Slovenia 101st out of 215 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square in Slovenia, year by year
| Year | metric tons per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0431 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.0357 metric tons per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1994 | 0.0391 metric tons per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1995 | 0.0392 metric tons per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1996 | 0.0431 metric tons per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0455 metric tons per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0451 metric tons per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0599 metric tons per square kilometre | +32.7% |
| 2000 | 0.0586 metric tons per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2001 | 0.0627 metric tons per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2002 | 0.064 metric tons per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0672 metric tons per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2004 | 0.078 metric tons per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0668 metric tons per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.068 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2007 | 0.0671 metric tons per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0653 metric tons per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2009 | 0.0649 metric tons per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2010 | 0.0386 metric tons per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0693 metric tons per square kilometre | +79.4% |
| 2012 | 0.0573 metric tons per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 2013 | 0.0609 metric tons per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2014 | 0.0693 metric tons per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2015 | 0.0803 metric tons per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2016 | 0.0923 metric tons per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2017 | 0.0869 metric tons per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2018 | 0.0965 metric tons per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2019 | 0.1065 metric tons per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0831 metric tons per square kilometre | -22.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0837 metric tons per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2022 | 0.0816 metric tons per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2023 | 0.0566 metric tons per square kilometre | -30.7% |
Slovenia compared with similar countries
- Slovenia's 0.0566 metric tons per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.0566 metric tons per square kilometre, 1.0× the median. (85 countries reporting)
- Slovenia's 0.0566 metric tons per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.0764 metric tons per square kilometre, 74% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square in Slovenia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | +79.4% | 0.0386 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0693 metric tons per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0438 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0357 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0599 metric tons per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0663 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0586 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.078 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0758 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0386 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.1065 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0762 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0566 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.0837 metric tons per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Slovenia
- 98 Seychelles 0.0626 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 99 New Caledonia 0.0584 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 100 Slovakia 0.0576 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 102 United States 0.055 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 103 Paraguay 0.0509 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 104 Malawi 0.0507 metric tons per square kilometre compare
More reference data data for Slovenia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.064 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3634 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0228 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3634 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2921 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3244 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.124 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square in Slovenia?
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square in Slovenia was 0.0566 metric tons per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square recorded in Slovenia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1065 metric tons per square kilometre in 2019.
- What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square recorded in Slovenia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0357 metric tons per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Slovenia rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square?
- Slovenia ranks 101st out of 215 countries with data for 2023.
- Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square rising or falling in Slovenia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Slovenia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.