Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Dominican Republic

Dominican Republic: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita was 0.0004 metric tons per person in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
0.0004 metric tons per person
Change on year
up 5.2%
World rank
120th
of 215 countries
All-time high
0.0005 metric tons per person
in 1994
All-time low
0 metric tons per person
in 1960
Years of data
65
1960–2024

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Dominican Republic, 1960–2024

0000.001196019922024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per person.

Analysis

Dominican Republic recorded 0.0004 metric tons per person for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in 2024.

The figure is up 5.2% on the previous year and up 73.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Dominican Republic peaked at 0.0005 metric tons per person in 1994 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons per person, in 1960.

Dominican Republic ranks 120th of 215 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Dominican Republic, year by year

Annual values for Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Dominican Republic, 1960 to 2024.
Year metric tons per person Change
1960 0 metric tons per person
1961 0 metric tons per person
1962 0 metric tons per person
1963 0 metric tons per person
1964 0 metric tons per person
1965 0 metric tons per person
1966 0 metric tons per person
1967 0 metric tons per person
1968 0 metric tons per person
1969 0 metric tons per person
1970 0 metric tons per person
1971 0 metric tons per person
1972 0 metric tons per person
1973 0 metric tons per person
1974 0 metric tons per person
1975 0 metric tons per person
1976 0 metric tons per person
1977 0 metric tons per person
1978 0 metric tons per person
1979 0 metric tons per person
1980 0 metric tons per person
1981 0 metric tons per person
1982 0 metric tons per person
1983 0 metric tons per person
1984 0 metric tons per person +1529.1%
1985 0 metric tons per person +277.5%
1986 0 metric tons per person +52.6%
1987 0 metric tons per person +5.0%
1988 0 metric tons per person -16.0%
1989 0 metric tons per person -21.9%
1990 0 metric tons per person +24.1%
1991 0.0001 metric tons per person +115.2%
1992 0.0001 metric tons per person +29.9%
1993 0.0002 metric tons per person +62.1%
1994 0.0005 metric tons per person +190.0%
1995 0.0003 metric tons per person -45.6%
1996 0.0001 metric tons per person -64.9%
1997 0.0001 metric tons per person -15.7%
1998 0.0001 metric tons per person +17.7%
1999 0.0001 metric tons per person -9.1%
2000 0.0002 metric tons per person +179.5%
2001 0.0003 metric tons per person +22.6%
2002 0.0004 metric tons per person +32.3%
2003 0.0002 metric tons per person -46.1%
2004 0.0002 metric tons per person +1.5%
2005 0.0001 metric tons per person -51.6%
2006 0.0001 metric tons per person -1.2%
2007 0.0001 metric tons per person +8.9%
2008 0.0001 metric tons per person -1.2%
2009 0.0001 metric tons per person +12.5%
2010 0.0001 metric tons per person +2.7%
2011 0.0002 metric tons per person +65.7%
2012 0.0001 metric tons per person -52.6%
2013 0.0002 metric tons per person +50.8%
2014 0.0002 metric tons per person +36.8%
2015 0.0002 metric tons per person +3.8%
2016 0.0002 metric tons per person -9.5%
2017 0.0002 metric tons per person +24.6%
2018 0.0003 metric tons per person +12.8%
2019 0.0003 metric tons per person +4.1%
2020 0.0003 metric tons per person +7.2%
2021 0.0003 metric tons per person +5.3%
2022 0.0003 metric tons per person +1.8%
2023 0.0003 metric tons per person +4.7%
2024 0.0004 metric tons per person +5.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 10
1970s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 10
1980s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 10
1990s 0.0002 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0.0005 metric tons per person 10
2000s 0.0002 metric tons per person 0.0001 metric tons per person 0.0004 metric tons per person 10
2010s 0.0002 metric tons per person 0.0001 metric tons per person 0.0003 metric tons per person 10
2020s 0.0003 metric tons per person 0.0003 metric tons per person 0.0004 metric tons per person 5

Countries ranked near Dominican Republic

  1. 117 Guam 0.0004 metric tons per person compare
  2. 118 Togo 0.0004 metric tons per person compare
  3. 119 Mali 0.0004 metric tons per person compare
  4. 121 Hong Kong, China 0.0003 metric tons per person compare
  5. 122 Iraq 0.0003 metric tons per person compare
  6. 123 Azerbaijan 0.0003 metric tons per person compare

See the full ranking of 215 places →

More reference data data for Dominican Republic

All data for Dominican Republic →

Frequently asked questions

What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Dominican Republic?
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Dominican Republic was 0.0004 metric tons per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Dominican Republic?
The highest recorded value was 0.0005 metric tons per person in 1994.
What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Dominican Republic?
The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons per person in 1960.
How does Dominican Republic rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita?
Dominican Republic ranks 120th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
Over the last ten years it is up 73.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Dominican Republic. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/dominican-republic/">Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Dominican Republic</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,819 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.