Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita was 0.0024 metric tons per person in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
0.0024 metric tons per person
Change on year
down 26.5%
World rank
60th
of 215 countries
All-time high
0.0064 metric tons per person
in 2013
All-time low
0 metric tons per person
in 1960
Years of data
65
1960–2024

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica, 1960–2024

00.0020.0040.006196019922024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per person.

Analysis

In 2024, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica stood at 0.0024 metric tons per person.

The figure is down 26.5% on the previous year and down 57.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica peaked at 0.0064 metric tons per person in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons per person, in 1960.

That places Costa Rica 60th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica, 1960 to 2024.
Year metric tons per person Change
1960 0 metric tons per person
1961 0 metric tons per person
1962 0 metric tons per person
1963 0 metric tons per person
1964 0 metric tons per person
1965 0 metric tons per person
1966 0 metric tons per person
1967 0 metric tons per person
1968 0 metric tons per person
1969 0 metric tons per person
1970 0 metric tons per person
1971 0 metric tons per person
1972 0 metric tons per person
1973 0 metric tons per person
1974 0 metric tons per person
1975 0 metric tons per person
1976 0 metric tons per person +94.9%
1977 0 metric tons per person +119.2%
1978 0 metric tons per person +40.6%
1979 0 metric tons per person +42.3%
1980 0 metric tons per person +38.3%
1981 0 metric tons per person +47.8%
1982 0 metric tons per person +37.6%
1983 0 metric tons per person +32.5%
1984 0.0001 metric tons per person +127.8%
1985 0 metric tons per person -44.3%
1986 0 metric tons per person -2.7%
1987 0.0001 metric tons per person +148.1%
1988 0.0001 metric tons per person +44.0%
1989 0.0001 metric tons per person +0.2%
1990 0.0002 metric tons per person +36.3%
1991 0.0006 metric tons per person +236.0%
1992 0.0007 metric tons per person +10.8%
1993 0.001 metric tons per person +44.9%
1994 0.0011 metric tons per person +14.4%
1995 0.0019 metric tons per person +68.7%
1996 0.0019 metric tons per person +1.0%
1997 0.0019 metric tons per person -2.0%
1998 0.0021 metric tons per person +11.0%
1999 0.0024 metric tons per person +15.1%
2000 0.0025 metric tons per person +2.1%
2001 0.0026 metric tons per person +6.4%
2002 0.0044 metric tons per person +67.3%
2003 0.005 metric tons per person +13.1%
2004 0.0059 metric tons per person +18.5%
2005 0.0056 metric tons per person -4.1%
2006 0.0046 metric tons per person -18.1%
2007 0.0059 metric tons per person +27.3%
2008 0.0061 metric tons per person +3.6%
2009 0.0055 metric tons per person -9.7%
2010 0.0059 metric tons per person +7.1%
2011 0.006 metric tons per person +2.1%
2012 0.0059 metric tons per person -2.7%
2013 0.0064 metric tons per person +10.0%
2014 0.0056 metric tons per person -12.8%
2015 0.0049 metric tons per person -12.9%
2016 0.0046 metric tons per person -6.7%
2017 0.0043 metric tons per person -5.8%
2018 0.0044 metric tons per person +3.0%
2019 0.0044 metric tons per person -0.4%
2020 0.0032 metric tons per person -26.7%
2021 0.0034 metric tons per person +5.9%
2022 0.0033 metric tons per person -3.5%
2023 0.0032 metric tons per person -2.3%
2024 0.0024 metric tons per person -26.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 10
1970s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 10
1980s 0.0001 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0.0001 metric tons per person 10
1990s 0.0014 metric tons per person 0.0002 metric tons per person 0.0024 metric tons per person 10
2000s 0.0048 metric tons per person 0.0025 metric tons per person 0.0061 metric tons per person 10
2010s 0.0052 metric tons per person 0.0043 metric tons per person 0.0064 metric tons per person 10
2020s 0.0031 metric tons per person 0.0024 metric tons per person 0.0034 metric tons per person 5

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 57 Sri Lanka 0.0026 metric tons per person compare
  2. 58 Montenegro 0.0025 metric tons per person compare
  3. 59 Russian Federation 0.0024 metric tons per person compare
  4. 61 Portugal 0.0023 metric tons per person compare
  5. 62 Guyana 0.0022 metric tons per person compare
  6. 63 Mexico 0.0021 metric tons per person compare

See the full ranking of 215 places →

More reference data data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica?
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica was 0.0024 metric tons per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 0.0064 metric tons per person in 2013.
What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons per person in 1960.
How does Costa Rica rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita?
Costa Rica ranks 60th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is down 57.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/costa-rica/">Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,819 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.