Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Chile

Chile: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita was 0.0719 metric tons per person in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
0.0719 metric tons per person
Change on year
down 6.0%
World rank
4th
of 215 countries
All-time high
0.078 metric tons per person
in 2022
All-time low
0 metric tons per person
in 1961
Years of data
65
1960–2024

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Chile, 1960–2024

00.020.040.060.08196019922024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per person.

Analysis

Chile recorded 0.0719 metric tons per person for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in 2024.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.0% on the previous year and up 4.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Chile peaked at 0.078 metric tons per person in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons per person, in 1961.

That places Chile 4th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Chile, year by year

Annual values for Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Chile, 1960 to 2024.
Year metric tons per person Change
1960 0 metric tons per person
1961 0 metric tons per person -2.1%
1962 0 metric tons per person +10.2%
1963 0 metric tons per person +8.9%
1964 0 metric tons per person +7.9%
1965 0 metric tons per person +7.0%
1966 0 metric tons per person +88.1%
1967 0 metric tons per person -38.5%
1968 0 metric tons per person +24.9%
1969 0 metric tons per person +8.0%
1970 0 metric tons per person -10.5%
1971 0 metric tons per person +13.9%
1972 0 metric tons per person +19.7%
1973 0 metric tons per person +41.1%
1974 0 metric tons per person +17.8%
1975 0.0001 metric tons per person +20.7%
1976 0.0001 metric tons per person +33.5%
1977 0.0001 metric tons per person +9.5%
1978 0.0001 metric tons per person +31.6%
1979 0.0001 metric tons per person +36.5%
1980 0.0002 metric tons per person +35.9%
1981 0.0002 metric tons per person +31.6%
1982 0.0004 metric tons per person +87.8%
1983 0.0002 metric tons per person -63.4%
1984 0.0007 metric tons per person +330.2%
1985 0.0006 metric tons per person -14.3%
1986 0.0008 metric tons per person +30.6%
1987 0.0011 metric tons per person +38.0%
1988 0.0025 metric tons per person +128.4%
1989 0.0039 metric tons per person +56.6%
1990 0.0052 metric tons per person +34.5%
1991 0.0077 metric tons per person +46.9%
1992 0.0084 metric tons per person +8.7%
1993 0.0096 metric tons per person +14.4%
1994 0.0128 metric tons per person +34.0%
1995 0.0142 metric tons per person +10.6%
1996 0.0219 metric tons per person +54.5%
1997 0.0251 metric tons per person +14.5%
1998 0.0239 metric tons per person -4.9%
1999 0.0199 metric tons per person -16.5%
2000 0.0274 metric tons per person +37.5%
2001 0.0403 metric tons per person +46.9%
2002 0.0389 metric tons per person -3.3%
2003 0.0379 metric tons per person -2.6%
2004 0.043 metric tons per person +13.5%
2005 0.0452 metric tons per person +5.2%
2006 0.0504 metric tons per person +11.5%
2007 0.0484 metric tons per person -4.1%
2008 0.0517 metric tons per person +6.9%
2009 0.0518 metric tons per person +0.2%
2010 0.0415 metric tons per person -19.9%
2011 0.0559 metric tons per person +34.6%
2012 0.0614 metric tons per person +9.9%
2013 0.0591 metric tons per person -3.7%
2014 0.0687 metric tons per person +16.2%
2015 0.0586 metric tons per person -14.7%
2016 0.0575 metric tons per person -1.9%
2017 0.0657 metric tons per person +14.3%
2018 0.0681 metric tons per person +3.7%
2019 0.0733 metric tons per person +7.6%
2020 0.0777 metric tons per person +6.0%
2021 0.0742 metric tons per person -4.5%
2022 0.078 metric tons per person +5.1%
2023 0.0764 metric tons per person -1.9%
2024 0.0719 metric tons per person -6.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 10
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0.0001 metric tons per person 10
1980s 0.0011 metric tons per person 0.0002 metric tons per person 0.0039 metric tons per person 10
1990s 0.0149 metric tons per person 0.0052 metric tons per person 0.0251 metric tons per person 10
2000s 0.0435 metric tons per person 0.0274 metric tons per person 0.0518 metric tons per person 10
2010s 0.061 metric tons per person 0.0415 metric tons per person 0.0733 metric tons per person 10
2020s 0.0756 metric tons per person 0.0719 metric tons per person 0.078 metric tons per person 5

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 1 Faroe Islands 2 metric tons per person compare
  2. 2 Norway 0.2992 metric tons per person compare
  3. 3 Iceland 0.1418 metric tons per person compare
  4. 5 Ecuador 0.0682 metric tons per person compare
  5. 6 China 0.0582 metric tons per person compare
  6. 7 Viet Nam 0.0559 metric tons per person compare

See the full ranking of 215 places →

More reference data data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Chile?
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Chile was 0.0719 metric tons per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 0.078 metric tons per person in 2022.
What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons per person in 1961.
How does Chile rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita?
Chile ranks 4th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Chile. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/chile/">Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Chile</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,819 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.