Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate in Brazil
Brazil: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate was -100 % change on previous year in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate in Brazil, 2001–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Brazil recorded -100 % change on previous year for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate in 2020. That is the lowest value across all 20 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.9% on the previous year and down 1,025.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate in Brazil peaked at -3.58 % change on previous year in 2001 and was at its lowest, -100 % change on previous year, in 2020.
Brazil ranks 97th of 131 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate in Brazil, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | -3.58 % change on previous year | — |
| 2002 | -3.98 % change on previous year | +11.1% |
| 2003 | -4.38 % change on previous year | +9.9% |
| 2004 | -4.8 % change on previous year | +9.8% |
| 2005 | -5.26 % change on previous year | +9.6% |
| 2006 | -5.78 % change on previous year | +9.9% |
| 2007 | -6.39 % change on previous year | +10.4% |
| 2008 | -7.09 % change on previous year | +11.0% |
| 2009 | -7.92 % change on previous year | +11.7% |
| 2010 | -8.89 % change on previous year | +12.2% |
| 2011 | -10.02 % change on previous year | +12.8% |
| 2012 | -11.42 % change on previous year | +14.0% |
| 2013 | -13.22 % change on previous year | +15.7% |
| 2014 | -15.6 % change on previous year | +18.1% |
| 2015 | -18.94 % change on previous year | +21.4% |
| 2016 | -23.94 % change on previous year | +26.4% |
| 2017 | -32.21 % change on previous year | +34.5% |
| 2018 | -48.54 % change on previous year | +50.7% |
| 2019 | -96.21 % change on previous year | +98.2% |
| 2020 | -100 % change on previous year | +3.9% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's -100 % change on previous year is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -13.59 % change on previous year, 7.4× the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Brazil's -100 % change on previous year is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -6.26 % change on previous year, 16.0× the median. (27 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate in Brazil changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | -98.2% | -48.54 % change on previous year | -96.21 % change on previous year |
| 2018 | -50.7% | -32.21 % change on previous year | -48.54 % change on previous year |
| 2017 | -34.5% | -23.94 % change on previous year | -32.21 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -5.46 % change on previous year | -7.92 % change on previous year | -3.58 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2010s | -27.9 % change on previous year | -96.21 % change on previous year | -8.89 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 1 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 94 Peru -33.96 % change on previous year compare
- 95 Morocco -41.72 % change on previous year compare
- 96 Cape Verde -80.6 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Afghanistan -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Albania -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Argentina -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Armenia -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Azerbaijan -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Bangladesh -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Bosnia and Herzegovina -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Bolivia -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Bhutan -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Chile -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 China -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Ecuador -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Egypt -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Fiji -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Greece -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 India -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Iran -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Kyrgyzstan -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Cambodia -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Laos -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Sri Lanka -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Maldives -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Mexico -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Montenegro -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Malaysia -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Oman -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Paraguay -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Palestine -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Thailand -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Turkmenistan -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 East Timor -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Uruguay -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Vietnam -100 % change on previous year compare
- 97 Zimbabwe -100 % change on previous year compare
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate in Brazil?
- Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate in Brazil was -100 % change on previous year in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was -3.58 % change on previous year in 2001.
- What is the lowest sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -100 % change on previous year in 2020.
- How does Brazil rank for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate?
- Brazil ranks 97th out of 131 countries with data for 2020.
- Is sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1,025.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.