Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate in Ecuador
Ecuador: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate was -13.51 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate in Ecuador, 2001–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded -13.51 % change on previous year for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.
That represents a change of down 14.4% on the previous year and down 183.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate in Ecuador peaked at -2.32 % change on previous year in 2003 and was at its lowest, -13.51 % change on previous year, in 2024.
That places Ecuador 88th out of 136 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | -2.85 % change on previous year | — |
| 2002 | -2.51 % change on previous year | -12.0% |
| 2003 | -2.32 % change on previous year | -7.7% |
| 2004 | -2.46 % change on previous year | +6.2% |
| 2005 | -2.62 % change on previous year | +6.6% |
| 2006 | -2.78 % change on previous year | +6.2% |
| 2007 | -2.97 % change on previous year | +6.5% |
| 2008 | -3.15 % change on previous year | +6.1% |
| 2009 | -3.34 % change on previous year | +6.2% |
| 2010 | -3.58 % change on previous year | +7.3% |
| 2011 | -3.77 % change on previous year | +5.1% |
| 2012 | -4.01 % change on previous year | +6.5% |
| 2013 | -4.39 % change on previous year | +9.4% |
| 2014 | -4.77 % change on previous year | +8.7% |
| 2015 | -5.13 % change on previous year | +7.6% |
| 2016 | -5.51 % change on previous year | +7.4% |
| 2017 | -5.9 % change on previous year | +7.2% |
| 2018 | -6.3 % change on previous year | +6.7% |
| 2019 | -6.98 % change on previous year | +10.8% |
| 2020 | -8.21 % change on previous year | +17.7% |
| 2021 | -9.49 % change on previous year | +15.5% |
| 2022 | -10.55 % change on previous year | +11.2% |
| 2023 | -11.81 % change on previous year | +12.0% |
| 2024 | -13.51 % change on previous year | +14.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -2.78 % change on previous year | -3.34 % change on previous year | -2.32 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2010s | -5.03 % change on previous year | -6.98 % change on previous year | -3.58 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -10.71 % change on previous year | -13.51 % change on previous year | -8.21 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 85 Honduras -12.19 % change on previous year compare
- 86 East Timor -12.75 % change on previous year compare
- 87 Azerbaijan -13.28 % change on previous year compare
- 89 Philippines -13.77 % change on previous year compare
- 90 Laos -14.47 % change on previous year compare
- 91 Yemen -15.09 % change on previous year compare
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate in Ecuador?
- Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate in Ecuador was -13.51 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was -2.32 % change on previous year in 2003.
- What is the lowest sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -13.51 % change on previous year in 2024.
- How does Ecuador rank for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate?
- Ecuador ranks 88th out of 136 countries with data for 2024.
- Is sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 183.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.