Rule of Law in Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone: Rule of Law was 0.1431 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Rule of Law in Sierra Leone, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rule of law in Sierra Leone is 0.1431 standard error, measured in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
That represents a change of down 4.4% on the previous year and down 42.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rule of law in Sierra Leone peaked at 0.3093 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1431 standard error, in 2011.
Sierra Leone ranks 16th of 53 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Rule of Law in Sierra Leone, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.3093 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2759 standard error | -10.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2502 standard error | -9.3% |
| 2002 | 0.2223 standard error | -11.2% |
| 2003 | 0.2193 standard error | -1.4% |
| 2004 | 0.2054 standard error | -6.3% |
| 2005 | 0.2023 standard error | -1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.1913 standard error | -5.4% |
| 2007 | 0.1929 standard error | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 0.1846 standard error | -4.3% |
| 2009 | 0.1535 standard error | -16.9% |
| 2010 | 0.1496 standard error | -2.5% |
| 2011 | 0.1431 standard error | -4.4% |
Sierra Leone compared with similar countries
- Sierra Leone's 0.1431 standard error is above the median for low income countries, which is 0.1377 standard error, 1.0× the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Sierra Leone's 0.1431 standard error is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1348 standard error, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2926 standard error | 0.2759 standard error | 0.3093 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.2024 standard error | 0.1535 standard error | 0.2502 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1463 standard error | 0.1431 standard error | 0.1496 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Sierra Leone
More reference data data for Sierra Leone
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0238 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5935 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0797 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6534 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rule of law in Sierra Leone?
- Rule of law in Sierra Leone was 0.1431 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest rule of law recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3093 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest rule of law recorded in Sierra Leone?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1431 standard error in 2011.
- How does Sierra Leone rank for rule of law?
- Sierra Leone ranks 16th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is rule of law rising or falling in Sierra Leone?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Rule of Law (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.RULE.LW.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.