Rule of Law Index in Tunisia
Tunisia: Rule of Law Index was 0.596 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Rule of Law Index in Tunisia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rule of law index in Tunisia is 0.596, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 7.0% on the previous year and down 24.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rule of law index in Tunisia peaked at 0.821 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.149, in 1865.
Tunisia ranks 82nd of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rule of Law Index in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.15 | — |
| 1790 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.25 | +66.7% |
| 1858 | 0.25 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.311 | +24.4% |
| 1860 | 0.311 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.311 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.311 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.299 | -3.9% |
| 1864 | 0.29 | -3.0% |
| 1865 | 0.149 | -48.6% |
| 1866 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.224 | +50.3% |
| 1871 | 0.263 | +17.4% |
| 1872 | 0.263 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.278 | +5.7% |
| 1874 | 0.278 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.278 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.278 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.278 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.158 | -43.2% |
| 1879 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.158 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.15 | -5.1% |
| 1882 | 0.202 | +34.7% |
| 1883 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.202 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.214 | +5.9% |
| 1901 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.214 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.217 | +1.4% |
| 1911 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.217 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.192 | -11.5% |
| 1927 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.192 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.2 | +4.2% |
| 1943 | 0.201 | +0.5% |
| 1944 | 0.196 | -2.5% |
| 1945 | 0.196 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.196 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.2 | +2.0% |
| 1948 | 0.2 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.2 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.207 | +3.5% |
| 1951 | 0.207 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.19 | -8.2% |
| 1953 | 0.19 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.209 | +10.0% |
| 1955 | 0.214 | +2.4% |
| 1956 | 0.333 | +55.6% |
| 1957 | 0.342 | +2.7% |
| 1958 | 0.537 | +57.0% |
| 1959 | 0.548 | +2.0% |
| 1960 | 0.548 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.548 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.548 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.54 | -1.5% |
| 1964 | 0.54 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.54 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.54 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.54 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.54 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.535 | -0.9% |
| 1970 | 0.523 | -2.2% |
| 1971 | 0.523 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.523 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.523 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.523 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.523 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.537 | +2.7% |
| 1977 | 0.537 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.537 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.537 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.539 | +0.4% |
| 1981 | 0.539 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.539 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.539 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.539 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.539 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.539 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.512 | -5.0% |
| 1988 | 0.153 | -70.1% |
| 1989 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.195 | +27.5% |
| 2011 | 0.765 | +292.3% |
| 2012 | 0.768 | +0.4% |
| 2013 | 0.762 | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 0.759 | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.786 | +3.6% |
| 2016 | 0.78 | -0.8% |
| 2017 | 0.807 | +3.5% |
| 2018 | 0.81 | +0.4% |
| 2019 | 0.82 | +1.2% |
| 2020 | 0.821 | +0.1% |
| 2021 | 0.768 | -6.5% |
| 2022 | 0.639 | -16.8% |
| 2023 | 0.57 | -10.8% |
| 2024 | 0.557 | -2.3% |
| 2025 | 0.596 | +7.0% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 0.596 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.3495, 1.7× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 0.596 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.321, 1.9× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.1861 | 0.15 | 0.311 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.2267 | 0.149 | 0.311 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.2456 | 0.158 | 0.278 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.1924 | 0.15 | 0.202 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.202 | 0.202 | 0.202 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.214 | 0.214 | 0.214 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.217 | 0.217 | 0.217 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.207 | 0.192 | 0.217 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.192 | 0.192 | 0.192 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.1973 | 0.192 | 0.201 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.2977 | 0.19 | 0.548 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.5419 | 0.535 | 0.548 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.5286 | 0.523 | 0.537 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4591 | 0.153 | 0.539 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.153 | 0.153 | 0.153 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.153 | 0.153 | 0.153 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.7252 | 0.195 | 0.82 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6585 | 0.557 | 0.821 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rule of law index in Tunisia?
- Rule of law index in Tunisia was 0.596 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rule of law index recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.821 in 2020.
- What is the lowest rule of law index recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.149 in 1865.
- How does Tunisia rank for rule of law index?
- Tunisia ranks 82nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rule of law index rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 24.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rule of Law Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the government complies with the law, courts are independent, laws transparent, justice accessible, corruption absent, and the bureaucracy is impartial.