Rule of Law Index in Cuba
Cuba: Rule of Law Index was 0.123 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Rule of Law Index in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rule of law index in Cuba is 0.123, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 237 years on record.
That represents a change of down 1.6% on the previous year and down 8.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rule of law index in Cuba peaked at 0.499 in 1940 and was at its lowest, 0.123, in 2025.
That places Cuba 153rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Rule of Law Index in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.262 | — |
| 1790 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.266 | +1.5% |
| 1888 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.321 | +20.7% |
| 1899 | 0.34 | +5.9% |
| 1900 | 0.416 | +22.4% |
| 1901 | 0.416 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.465 | +11.8% |
| 1903 | 0.465 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.465 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.465 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.457 | -1.7% |
| 1907 | 0.433 | -5.3% |
| 1908 | 0.433 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.433 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.431 | -0.5% |
| 1911 | 0.431 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.431 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.448 | +3.9% |
| 1914 | 0.451 | +0.7% |
| 1915 | 0.451 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.451 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.451 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.451 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.451 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.451 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.451 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.442 | -2.0% |
| 1923 | 0.442 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.442 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.442 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.442 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.442 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.396 | -10.4% |
| 1929 | 0.354 | -10.6% |
| 1930 | 0.342 | -3.4% |
| 1931 | 0.334 | -2.3% |
| 1932 | 0.334 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.335 | +0.3% |
| 1934 | 0.437 | +30.4% |
| 1935 | 0.437 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.437 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.437 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.437 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.437 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.499 | +14.2% |
| 1941 | 0.499 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.499 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.499 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.499 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.491 | -1.6% |
| 1946 | 0.477 | -2.9% |
| 1947 | 0.477 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.463 | -2.9% |
| 1949 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.434 | -6.3% |
| 1952 | 0.357 | -17.7% |
| 1953 | 0.212 | -40.6% |
| 1954 | 0.218 | +2.8% |
| 1955 | 0.218 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.218 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.218 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.218 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.231 | +6.0% |
| 1960 | 0.169 | -26.8% |
| 1961 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.169 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.18 | +6.5% |
| 1977 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.18 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.145 | -19.4% |
| 1993 | 0.144 | -0.7% |
| 1994 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.144 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.135 | -6.2% |
| 2004 | 0.135 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.135 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.135 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.135 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.138 | +2.2% |
| 2009 | 0.138 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.138 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.138 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.138 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.142 | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 0.142 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.134 | -5.6% |
| 2016 | 0.151 | +12.7% |
| 2017 | 0.132 | -12.6% |
| 2018 | 0.142 | +7.6% |
| 2019 | 0.144 | +1.4% |
| 2020 | 0.142 | -1.4% |
| 2021 | 0.14 | -1.4% |
| 2022 | 0.14 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.134 | -4.3% |
| 2024 | 0.125 | -6.7% |
| 2025 | 0.123 | -1.6% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.123 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.4345, 28% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.123 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.577, 21% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.262 | 0.262 | 0.262 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.2632 | 0.262 | 0.266 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.2789 | 0.266 | 0.34 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.4448 | 0.416 | 0.465 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.4447 | 0.431 | 0.451 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.4304 | 0.354 | 0.451 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.3967 | 0.334 | 0.437 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.4866 | 0.463 | 0.499 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.2787 | 0.212 | 0.463 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.169 | 0.169 | 0.169 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.1734 | 0.169 | 0.18 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1513 | 0.144 | 0.18 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1383 | 0.135 | 0.144 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1401 | 0.132 | 0.151 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.134 | 0.123 | 0.142 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 150 Madagascar 0.148 compare
- 151 Uzbekistan 0.147 compare
- 152 Libya 0.125 compare
- 154 Russia 0.121 compare
- 155 Central African Republic 0.118 compare
- 156 Mauritania 0.117 compare
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rule of law index in Cuba?
- Rule of law index in Cuba was 0.123 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rule of law index recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.499 in 1940.
- What is the lowest rule of law index recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.123 in 2025.
- How does Cuba rank for rule of law index?
- Cuba ranks 153rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rule of law index rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rule of Law Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the government complies with the law, courts are independent, laws transparent, justice accessible, corruption absent, and the bureaucracy is impartial.