Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Tunisia
Tunisia: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -0.182 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-0.182
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
111th
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.41
in 2020
All-time low
-1.71
in 1878
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Tunisia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rigorous and impartial public administration score in Tunisia is -0.182, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 142.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Tunisia peaked at 1.41 in 2020 and was at its lowest, -1.71, in 1878.
Tunisia ranks 111th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.68 | — |
| 1790 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.68 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.883 | -47.6% |
| 1858 | -0.883 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.883 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.883 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.883 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.883 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.883 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.883 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.7 | +92.5% |
| 1866 | -1.7 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.7 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.7 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.7 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.904 | -46.8% |
| 1871 | -0.904 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.904 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.904 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.904 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.904 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.904 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.904 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.71 | +89.3% |
| 1879 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.71 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.44 | -15.8% |
| 1883 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.27 | -11.5% |
| 1911 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.709 | -44.3% |
| 1957 | -0.069 | -90.3% |
| 1958 | 0.114 | -265.2% |
| 1959 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.114 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.583 | +411.4% |
| 1977 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.583 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.973 | -266.9% |
| 1989 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.973 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.86 | -11.6% |
| 2011 | 0.392 | -145.6% |
| 2012 | 0.467 | +19.1% |
| 2013 | 0.514 | +10.1% |
| 2014 | 0.514 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.432 | -16.0% |
| 2016 | 0.432 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.01 | +133.1% |
| 2018 | 0.981 | -2.6% |
| 2019 | 1.25 | +27.5% |
| 2020 | 1.41 | +12.3% |
| 2021 | 0.99 | -29.5% |
| 2022 | 0.701 | -29.2% |
| 2023 | 0.164 | -76.6% |
| 2024 | -0.182 | -211.0% |
| 2025 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's -0.182 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.1905, 96% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's -0.182 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.364, 50% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.68 | -1.68 | -1.68 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.68 | -1.68 | -1.68 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.68 | -1.68 | -1.68 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.68 | -1.68 | -1.68 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.68 | -1.68 | -1.68 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.68 | -1.68 | -1.68 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.68 | -1.68 | -1.68 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.44 | -1.68 | -0.883 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.29 | -1.7 | -0.883 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.07 | -1.71 | -0.904 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.49 | -1.71 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.44 | -1.44 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.44 | -1.44 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.27 | -1.27 | -1.27 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.27 | -1.27 | -1.27 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.27 | -1.27 | -1.27 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.27 | -1.27 | -1.27 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.8194 | -1.27 | 0.114 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.114 | 0.114 | 0.114 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.3016 | 0.114 | 0.583 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2718 | -0.973 | 0.583 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.973 | -0.973 | -0.973 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.973 | -0.973 | -0.973 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.513 | -0.86 | 1.25 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.4827 | -0.182 | 1.41 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Tunisia?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Tunisia was -0.182 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.41 in 2020.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.71 in 1878.
- How does Tunisia rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Tunisia ranks 111th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 142.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.