Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Thailand
Thailand: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -0.296 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Thailand, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rigorous and impartial public administration score in Thailand is -0.296, measured in 2025.
The figure is up 85.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Thailand peaked at 0.524 in 2000 and was at its lowest, -2.04, in 2014.
That places Thailand 116th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 237 years of available data.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Thailand, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.73 | — |
| 1790 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.73 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.65 | -4.3% |
| 1909 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -2.01 | +21.6% |
| 1948 | -2.01 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -2.01 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.74 | -13.2% |
| 1951 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.74 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.11 | -36.2% |
| 1971 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.553 | -50.2% |
| 1981 | -0.327 | -40.9% |
| 1982 | -0.327 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.079 | -124.2% |
| 1984 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.383 | +384.8% |
| 1995 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.524 | +36.8% |
| 2001 | 0.524 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.524 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.524 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.524 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.197 | -137.6% |
| 2006 | -0.684 | +247.2% |
| 2007 | -0.795 | +16.2% |
| 2008 | -0.353 | -55.6% |
| 2009 | -0.353 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.353 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.235 | -33.4% |
| 2012 | -0.235 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.494 | +110.2% |
| 2014 | -2.04 | +313.6% |
| 2015 | -2.04 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -2.04 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -1.83 | -10.3% |
| 2018 | -1.4 | -23.9% |
| 2019 | -0.928 | -33.5% |
| 2020 | -0.673 | -27.5% |
| 2021 | -0.673 | -0.0% |
| 2022 | -0.673 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | -0.673 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.296 | -56.0% |
| 2025 | -0.296 | -0.0% |
Thailand compared with similar countries
- Thailand's -0.296 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755. (48 countries reporting)
- Thailand's -0.296 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.116. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.73 | -1.73 | -1.73 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.71 | -1.73 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.65 | -1.65 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.65 | -1.65 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.65 | -1.65 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.76 | -2.01 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.74 | -1.74 | -1.74 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.74 | -1.74 | -1.74 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.11 | -1.11 | -1.11 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.0654 | -0.553 | 0.079 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2614 | 0.079 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0238 | -0.795 | 0.524 | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.16 | -2.04 | -0.235 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5473 | -0.673 | -0.296 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Thailand
More reference data data for Thailand
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 13.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 65.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 7.92 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Thailand?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Thailand was -0.296 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Thailand?
- The highest recorded value was 0.524 in 2000.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Thailand?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.04 in 2014.
- How does Thailand rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Thailand ranks 116th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Thailand?
- Over the last ten years it is up 85.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Thailand data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.