Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Sweden
Sweden: Rigorous and impartial public administration score was 2.86 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
2.86
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
11th
of 176 countries
All-time high
3.63
in 2017
All-time low
-0.285
in 1789
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Sweden, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Sweden stood at 2.86.
The figure is down 15.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Sweden peaked at 3.63 in 2017 and was at its lowest, -0.285, in 1789.
Sweden ranks 11th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Sweden, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -0.285 | — |
| 1790 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.633 | -322.1% |
| 1861 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.633 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 1.73 | +173.1% |
| 1891 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 1.77 | +2.5% |
| 1934 | 1.77 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 1.77 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 1.77 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 1.77 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 1.77 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 1.77 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 1.99 | +12.0% |
| 1941 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 1.99 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 2.22 | +12.0% |
| 1947 | 2.22 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 2.22 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 2.22 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 2.83 | +27.1% |
| 1951 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 2.83 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 3.56 | +26.0% |
| 1961 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.56 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.37 | -5.4% |
| 2011 | 3.37 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.37 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.37 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.37 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.37 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.37 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.63 | +7.7% |
| 2018 | 3.63 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.63 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.63 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.63 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.63 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.86 | -21.2% |
| 2024 | 2.86 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.86 | +0.0% |
Sweden compared with similar countries
- Sweden's 2.86 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.58, 1.8× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Sweden's 2.86 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.15, 2.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -0.285 | -0.285 | -0.285 | 1 |
| 1790s | -0.285 | -0.285 | -0.285 | 10 |
| 1800s | -0.285 | -0.285 | -0.285 | 10 |
| 1810s | -0.285 | -0.285 | -0.285 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.285 | -0.285 | -0.285 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.285 | -0.285 | -0.285 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.285 | -0.285 | -0.285 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.285 | -0.285 | -0.285 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.633 | 0.633 | 0.633 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.633 | 0.633 | 0.633 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.633 | 0.633 | 0.633 | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.76 | 1.73 | 1.77 | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.08 | 1.99 | 2.22 | 10 |
| 1950s | 2.83 | 2.83 | 2.83 | 10 |
| 1960s | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.56 | 10 |
| 1970s | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.56 | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.56 | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.56 | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.56 | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.45 | 3.37 | 3.63 | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.24 | 2.86 | 3.63 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
More reference data data for Sweden
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2237 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2063 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9766 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.12 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Sweden?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Sweden was 2.86 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 3.63 in 2017.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.285 in 1789.
- How does Sweden rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Sweden ranks 11th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and impartial public administration score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).