Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Paraguay
Paraguay: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 0.061 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Latest (2025)
0.061
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
103rd
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.131
in 2008
All-time low
-2.58
in 1954
Years of data
215
1811–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Paraguay, 1811–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Paraguay recorded 0.061 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Paraguay peaked at 0.131 in 2008 and was at its lowest, -2.58, in 1954.
That places Paraguay 103rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 215 years of available data.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1811 | -1.97 | — |
| 1812 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.97 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.31 | -33.5% |
| 1925 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.31 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.75 | +33.6% |
| 1937 | -1.88 | +7.4% |
| 1938 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -2.58 | +37.7% |
| 1955 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -2.58 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.575 | -77.7% |
| 1991 | -0.575 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.101 | -82.4% |
| 1993 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.131 | -229.7% |
| 2009 | 0.131 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.131 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.131 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.131 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.07 | -153.4% |
| 2014 | 0.061 | -187.1% |
| 2015 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.061 | +0.0% |
Paraguay compared with similar countries
- Paraguay's 0.061 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755, 81% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Paraguay's 0.061 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.519, 12% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 9 |
| 1820s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.97 | -1.97 | -1.97 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.57 | -1.97 | -1.31 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.52 | -1.88 | -1.31 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.88 | -1.88 | -1.88 | 10 |
| 1950s | -2.3 | -2.58 | -1.88 | 10 |
| 1960s | -2.58 | -2.58 | -2.58 | 10 |
| 1970s | -2.58 | -2.58 | -2.58 | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.58 | -2.58 | -2.58 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.1958 | -0.575 | -0.101 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.0546 | -0.101 | 0.131 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0689 | -0.07 | 0.131 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Paraguay
More reference data data for Paraguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3166 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6344 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5539 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 29.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 3.45 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Paraguay?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Paraguay was 0.061 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was 0.131 in 2008.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.58 in 1954.
- How does Paraguay rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Paraguay ranks 103rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Paraguay?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 215 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.