Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -0.583 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-0.583
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
126th
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.39
in 1870
All-time low
-2.28
in 1950
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Kazakhstan, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rigorous and impartial public administration score in Kazakhstan is -0.583, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Kazakhstan peaked at 1.39 in 1870 and was at its lowest, -2.28, in 1950.
Kazakhstan ranks 126th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.87 | — |
| 1790 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.582 | -68.8% |
| 1856 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.377 | -164.8% |
| 1866 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 1.39 | +269.0% |
| 1871 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.383 | -72.5% |
| 1879 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.308 | -180.4% |
| 1882 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.448 | +45.5% |
| 1906 | -0.322 | -28.1% |
| 1907 | -0.246 | -23.6% |
| 1908 | -0.108 | -56.1% |
| 1909 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.178 | +64.8% |
| 1914 | -0.178 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.304 | +70.8% |
| 1916 | -0.304 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.096 | -68.4% |
| 1918 | -1.8 | +1780.2% |
| 1919 | -2.26 | +25.1% |
| 1920 | -2.2 | -2.4% |
| 1921 | -2.2 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.73 | -21.3% |
| 1923 | -1.32 | -23.8% |
| 1924 | -1.53 | +15.7% |
| 1925 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.46 | -4.7% |
| 1929 | -1.46 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.65 | +13.0% |
| 1931 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.86 | +12.6% |
| 1935 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.66 | -10.5% |
| 1941 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.86 | +12.2% |
| 1949 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.28 | +22.4% |
| 1951 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -2.02 | -11.6% |
| 1954 | -1.36 | -32.5% |
| 1955 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.21 | -11.3% |
| 1957 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1970 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.21 | -11.8% |
| 1972 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1984 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.23 | -11.1% |
| 1986 | -1.27 | +3.5% |
| 1987 | -1.08 | -14.7% |
| 1988 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.98 | -9.6% |
| 1991 | -0.98 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.814 | -16.9% |
| 1993 | -0.814 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.814 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.975 | +19.8% |
| 1996 | -0.975 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.975 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.975 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -1.17 | +19.6% |
| 2000 | -0.524 | -55.1% |
| 2001 | -0.524 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.524 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.524 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.524 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.734 | +40.1% |
| 2006 | -0.634 | -13.6% |
| 2007 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2014 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2018 | -0.634 | -0.0% |
| 2019 | -0.491 | -22.6% |
| 2020 | -0.491 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -0.687 | +39.9% |
| 2022 | -0.583 | -15.1% |
| 2023 | -0.583 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.583 | -0.0% |
| 2025 | -0.583 | -0.0% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's -0.583 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755. (48 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's -0.583 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.15. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.23 | -1.87 | -0.582 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.1025 | -0.582 | 0.377 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.19 | 0.383 | 1.39 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.2389 | -0.308 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.308 | -0.308 | -0.308 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.2772 | -0.448 | -0.108 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.5447 | -2.26 | -0.096 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.65 | -2.2 | -1.32 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.77 | -1.86 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.7 | -1.86 | -1.66 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.64 | -2.28 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.23 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.08 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.9468 | -1.17 | -0.814 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.589 | -0.734 | -0.524 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.6197 | -0.634 | -0.491 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.585 | -0.687 | -0.491 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Kazakhstan?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Kazakhstan was -0.583 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 1.39 in 1870.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.28 in 1950.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 126th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.