Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 0.443 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.443
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
82nd
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.443
in 2020
All-time low
-2.91
in 1884
Years of data
216
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Dominican Republic, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Dominican Republic stood at 0.443. That is the highest value across all 216 years on record.
The figure is up 247.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Dominican Republic peaked at 0.443 in 2020 and was at its lowest, -2.91, in 1884.
Dominican Republic ranks 82nd of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.35 | — |
| 1790 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.89 | +114.1% |
| 1803 | -2.89 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.89 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.27 | -21.6% |
| 1806 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.27 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.016 | -100.7% |
| 1810 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | -2.21 | -13912.5% |
| 1845 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -2.21 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.025 | -101.1% |
| 1867 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | -2.26 | -9140.0% |
| 1878 | -2.26 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1880 | 0 | — |
| 1881 | 0 | — |
| 1882 | 0 | — |
| 1883 | 0 | — |
| 1884 | -2.91 | — |
| 1885 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -2.91 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.79 | -38.4% |
| 1901 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.79 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.17 | -34.7% |
| 1907 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.75 | +50.0% |
| 1913 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.75 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.99 | +13.7% |
| 1917 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.99 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.22 | -38.8% |
| 1963 | 0.222 | -118.2% |
| 1964 | -0.796 | -458.6% |
| 1965 | -0.796 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.11 | +39.1% |
| 1967 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.11 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.434 | -60.8% |
| 1980 | -0.434 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.434 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.434 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.434 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.434 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.434 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.434 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -0.767 | +76.7% |
| 1988 | -0.767 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.767 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.767 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -0.767 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.767 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -1.51 | +96.5% |
| 1994 | -1.51 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -1.51 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.189 | -87.5% |
| 1997 | 0.432 | -328.6% |
| 1998 | 0.432 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.432 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.432 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.432 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.432 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.196 | -145.4% |
| 2004 | -0.196 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.196 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.196 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.196 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.196 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.196 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.196 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.196 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.119 | -39.3% |
| 2013 | -0.301 | +152.9% |
| 2014 | -0.301 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.301 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.301 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.39 | +29.6% |
| 2018 | -0.752 | +92.8% |
| 2019 | -0.752 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.443 | -158.9% |
| 2021 | 0.443 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.443 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.443 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.443 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.443 | +0.0% |
Dominican Republic compared with similar countries
- Dominican Republic's 0.443 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755, 5.9× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Dominican Republic's 0.443 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.519, 85% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.35 | -1.35 | -1.35 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.35 | -1.35 | -1.35 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.04 | -2.89 | 0.016 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 3 |
| 1840s | -2.21 | -2.21 | -2.21 | 6 |
| 1850s | -2.21 | -2.21 | -2.21 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.32 | -2.21 | 0.025 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.4345 | -2.26 | 0.025 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.74 | -2.91 | 0 | 10 |
| 1890s | -2.91 | -2.91 | -2.91 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.54 | -1.79 | -1.17 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.73 | -1.99 | -1.17 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.99 | -1.99 | -1.99 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.99 | -1.99 | -1.99 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.99 | -1.99 | -1.99 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.99 | -1.99 | -1.99 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.1 | -1.99 | 0.222 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.04 | -1.11 | -0.434 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.5339 | -0.767 | -0.434 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.5715 | -1.51 | 0.432 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.0076 | -0.196 | 0.432 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.3609 | -0.752 | -0.119 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.443 | 0.443 | 0.443 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
More reference data data for Dominican Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7575 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0601 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9595 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3273 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Dominican Republic?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Dominican Republic was 0.443 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 0.443 in 2020.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.91 in 1884.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 82nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 247.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 216 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.