Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Cuba
Cuba: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -1.76 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-1.76
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
162nd
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.181
in 1934
All-time low
-1.82
in 2016
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rigorous and impartial public administration score in Cuba is -1.76, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 14.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Cuba peaked at 0.181 in 1934 and was at its lowest, -1.82, in 2016.
That places Cuba 162nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -0.489 | — |
| 1790 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.489 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.167 | -134.2% |
| 1900 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.167 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.346 | -307.2% |
| 1929 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.181 | -152.3% |
| 1935 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.181 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | -0.01 | -105.5% |
| 1952 | -0.498 | +4880.0% |
| 1953 | -1.08 | +117.9% |
| 1954 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.721 | -33.5% |
| 1960 | -1.27 | +75.6% |
| 1961 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -1.27 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -1.48 | +16.8% |
| 1994 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -1.48 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -1.55 | +4.5% |
| 2014 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -1.55 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -1.82 | +17.8% |
| 2017 | -1.8 | -1.2% |
| 2018 | -1.76 | -2.0% |
| 2019 | -1.76 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | -1.76 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -1.76 | -0.0% |
| 2022 | -1.76 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | -1.76 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -1.76 | -0.0% |
| 2025 | -1.76 | -0.0% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's -1.76 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's -1.76 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.519. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 1 |
| 1790s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1800s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1810s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.489 | -0.489 | -0.489 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.4234 | -0.489 | 0.167 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.167 | 0.167 | 0.167 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.167 | 0.167 | 0.167 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.0644 | -0.346 | 0.167 | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.0298 | -0.346 | 0.181 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.181 | 0.181 | 0.181 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.7558 | -1.08 | 0.181 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.27 | -1.27 | -1.27 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.27 | -1.27 | -1.27 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.27 | -1.27 | -1.27 | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.42 | -1.48 | -1.27 | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.48 | -1.48 | -1.48 | 10 |
| 2010s | -1.62 | -1.82 | -1.48 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.76 | -1.76 | -1.76 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Cuba?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Cuba was -1.76 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.181 in 1934.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.82 in 2016.
- How does Cuba rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Cuba ranks 162nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.