Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Djibouti
Djibouti: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) was 84.38 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Djibouti, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Djibouti is 84.38, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is up 3.8% on the previous year and up 92.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Djibouti peaked at 84.38 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 43.75, in 2003.
That places Djibouti 16th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Djibouti, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 43.75 | — |
| 2004 | 43.75 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 43.75 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 43.75 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 43.75 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 43.75 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 43.75 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 43.75 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 43.75 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 43.75 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 56.25 | +28.6% |
| 2014 | 56.25 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 56.25 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 56.25 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 56.25 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 81.25 | +44.4% |
| 2019 | 84.38 | +3.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 43.75 | 43.75 | 7 |
| 2010s | 57.81 | 43.75 | 84.38 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Djibouti
- 16 China 84.38 compare
- 16 Azerbaijan 84.38 compare
- 16 Italy 84.38 compare
- 16 Kosovo 84.38 compare
- 16 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 84.38 compare
More reference data data for Djibouti
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0052 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2231 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0175 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0092 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0016 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Djibouti?
- Resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Djibouti was 84.38 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Djibouti?
- The highest recorded value was 84.38 in 2019.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Djibouti?
- The lowest recorded value was 43.75 in 2003.
- How does Djibouti rank for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Djibouti ranks 16th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) rising or falling in Djibouti?
- Over the last ten years it is up 92.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Djibouti data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.