Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Bahamas
Bahamas: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) was 37.5 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Bahamas, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Bahamas recorded 37.5 for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is up 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Bahamas peaked at 37.5 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 25, in 2003.
Bahamas ranks 133rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Bahamas, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 25 | — |
| 2004 | 25 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 25 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 25 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 25 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 25 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 25 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 25 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 25 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 25 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 37.5 | +50.0% |
| 2014 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 37.5 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25 | 25 | 25 | 7 |
| 2010s | 33.75 | 25 | 37.5 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Bahamas
- 131 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 40.62 compare
- 131 Mongolia 40.62 compare
- 133 Costa Rica 37.5 compare
- 133 Dominica 37.5 compare
- 133 Eswatini 37.5 compare
- 133 Fiji 37.5 compare
- 133 Hong Kong, China 37.5 compare
- 133 Namibia 37.5 compare
- 133 Papua New Guinea 37.5 compare
- 133 Sierra Leone 37.5 compare
- 133 Solomon Islands 37.5 compare
- 133 Tonga 37.5 compare
- 133 Vanuatu 37.5 compare
More reference data data for Bahamas
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.018 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0145 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0325 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0325 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0605 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0228 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0775 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Bahamas?
- Resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Bahamas was 37.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Bahamas?
- The highest recorded value was 37.5 in 2013.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Bahamas?
- The lowest recorded value was 25 in 2003.
- How does Bahamas rank for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Bahamas ranks 133rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) rising or falling in Bahamas?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bahamas data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.