How does Tunisia rank for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?

Tunisia ranks 43rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score rising or falling in Tunisia?

Over the last ten years it is down 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score in Tunisia

Name: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score in Tunisia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Tunisia: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score was 55.26 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

55.26

Change on year

up 0.0%

World rank

43rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

57.6

in 2004

All-time low

54.85

in 2003

Years of data

2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score in Tunisia, 2003–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Tunisia recorded 55.26 for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score in 2019.

The figure is down 1.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score in Tunisia peaked at 57.6 in 2004 and was at its lowest, 54.85, in 2003.

Tunisia ranks 43rd of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	55.87	54.85	57.6	7
2010s	55.84	55.25	56.29	10

Countries ranked near Tunisia

40 Israel 67.35 compare
41 Poland 65.56 compare
42 Belize 61.03 compare
44 Zambia 54.9 compare
45 Algeria 54.72 compare
46 Montenegro 54.17 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Tunisia

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)

All data for Tunisia →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score in Tunisia?: Resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score in Tunisia was 55.26 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score recorded in Tunisia?: The highest recorded value was 57.6 in 2004.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score recorded in Tunisia?: The lowest recorded value was 54.85 in 2003.
How does Tunisia rank for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?: Tunisia ranks 43rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score rising or falling in Tunisia?: Over the last ten years it is down 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Tunisia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.