Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score was 28.14 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score in Trinidad and Tobago, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Trinidad and Tobago recorded 28.14 for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score in 2019.
That represents a change of down 0.2% on the previous year and up 6.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 29.2 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 26.5, in 2007.
That places Trinidad and Tobago 126th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 28 | — |
| 2006 | 28.14 | +0.5% |
| 2007 | 26.5 | -5.8% |
| 2008 | 26.5 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 26.5 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 27.21 | +2.7% |
| 2011 | 28.42 | +4.5% |
| 2012 | 28.88 | +1.6% |
| 2013 | 28.99 | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 29.2 | +0.7% |
| 2015 | 29.2 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 28.74 | -1.6% |
| 2017 | 28.2 | -1.9% |
| 2018 | 28.2 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 28.14 | -0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.13 | 26.5 | 28.14 | 5 |
| 2010s | 28.52 | 27.21 | 29.2 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 123 Jordan 29.37 compare
- 124 Panama 29.06 compare
- 125 Afghanistan 28.74 compare
- 127 Papua New Guinea 26.82 compare
- 128 Solomon Islands 26.24 compare
- 129 Ghana 25.82 compare
More reference data data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0589 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0005 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2333 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0945 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3189 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7976 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0027 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score in Trinidad and Tobago was 28.14 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 29.2 in 2014.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 26.5 in 2007.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 126th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - score rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.