Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Kitts and Nevis: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 4.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
4.5 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
87th
of 191 countries
All-time high
4.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2014
All-time low
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Saint Kitts and Nevis, 2003–2019

0123452003201120192003: 0 DB15-20 methodology2004: 0 DB15-20 methodology2005: 0 DB15-20 methodology2006: 0 DB15-20 methodology2007: 0 DB15-20 methodology2008: 0 DB15-20 methodology2009: 0 DB15-20 methodology2010: 0 DB15-20 methodology2011: 0 DB15-20 methodology2012: 0 DB15-20 methodology2013: 0 DB15-20 methodology2014: 4.5 DB15-20 methodology2015: 4.5 DB15-20 methodology2016: 4.5 DB15-20 methodology2017: 4.5 DB15-20 methodology2018: 4.5 DB15-20 methodology2019: 4.5 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Saint Kitts and Nevis is 4.5 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Saint Kitts and Nevis peaked at 4.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2014 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 87th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Saint Kitts and Nevis, year by year

Annual values for Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) in Saint Kitts and Nevis, 2003 to 2019.
Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 0 DB15-20 methodology
2004 0 DB15-20 methodology
2005 0 DB15-20 methodology
2006 0 DB15-20 methodology
2007 0 DB15-20 methodology
2008 0 DB15-20 methodology
2009 0 DB15-20 methodology
2010 0 DB15-20 methodology
2011 0 DB15-20 methodology
2012 0 DB15-20 methodology
2013 0 DB15-20 methodology
2014 4.5 DB15-20 methodology
2015 4.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 4.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 4.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 4.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 4.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 2.7 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 4.5 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Saint Kitts and Nevis

  1. 87 India 4.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 87 Barbados 4.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 87 Cape Verde 4.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 87 Canada 4.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 87 Chile 4.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 87 Grenada 4.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 87 Jamaica 4.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 87 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 4.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 87 Trinidad and Tobago 4.5 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Saint Kitts and Nevis

All data for Saint Kitts and Nevis →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Saint Kitts and Nevis was 4.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
The highest recorded value was 4.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2014.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Saint Kitts and Nevis?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Saint Kitts and Nevis rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 87th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Saint Kitts and Nevis data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Saint Kitts and Nevis</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.