Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Liberia
Liberia: Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) was 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Liberia, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Liberia is 2.5 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Liberia peaked at 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Liberia ranks 52nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Liberia, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2005 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2007 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2008 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2009 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2011 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2012 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2013 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2017 | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2018 | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 0.75 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 2.5 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Liberia
- 52 Pakistan 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Mexico 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Russian Federation 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Brazil 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Argentina 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Armenia 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Australia 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Austria 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Bahrain 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Barbados 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Belgium 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Bulgaria 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Burundi 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Cape Verde 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Canada 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Chile 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Czechia 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Djibouti 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Dominican Republic 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Egypt 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Estonia 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Georgia 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Greece 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Grenada 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Hungary 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Iceland 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Jamaica 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Jordan 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Republic of Korea 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Kosovo 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Latvia 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Lithuania 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Luxembourg 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Malta 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Micronesia, Federated States of 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Republic of Moldova 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Montenegro 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Mozambique 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Netherlands 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Norway 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Panama 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Paraguay 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Peru 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Philippines 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Romania 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Samoa 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Serbia 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Seychelles 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Slovenia 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 South Sudan 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Sri Lanka 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Saint Kitts and Nevis 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Suriname 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Taiwan, China 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Thailand 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Timor-Leste 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Trinidad and Tobago 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Uganda 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Uruguay 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Uzbekistan 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Viet Nam 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 52 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 2.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Liberia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0476 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1282 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.229 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0532 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.229 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1597 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.183 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5564 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2896 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Liberia?
- Resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) in Liberia was 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Liberia?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2017.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3) recorded in Liberia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Liberia rank for resolving insolvency: commencement of proceedings index (0-3)?
- Liberia ranks 52nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Liberia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.