Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Suriname
Suriname: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.7955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Suriname, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Suriname recorded -0.7955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for regulatory quality - governance estimate in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.6% on the previous year and down 37.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Suriname peaked at -0.3409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013 and was at its lowest, -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Suriname 165th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Suriname, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.9121 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.2% |
| 2000 | -0.9464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.8% |
| 2002 | -0.8079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.6% |
| 2003 | -0.8064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2004 | -0.892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.6% |
| 2005 | -0.6941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.2% |
| 2006 | -0.5106 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -26.4% |
| 2007 | -0.4852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.0% |
| 2008 | -0.4758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.9% |
| 2009 | -0.445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.5% |
| 2010 | -0.4622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.9% |
| 2011 | -0.4125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.8% |
| 2012 | -0.3672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.0% |
| 2013 | -0.3409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.2% |
| 2014 | -0.5905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +73.2% |
| 2015 | -0.5794 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.9% |
| 2016 | -0.601 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2017 | -0.6323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.2% |
| 2018 | -0.6983 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.4% |
| 2019 | -0.6157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.8% |
| 2020 | -0.703 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.2% |
| 2021 | -0.6335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.9% |
| 2022 | -0.7222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.0% |
| 2023 | -0.745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2024 | -0.9315 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.0% |
| 2025 | -0.7955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.6% |
Suriname compared with similar countries
- Suriname's -0.7955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 8.5× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Suriname's -0.7955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -0.0884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 9.0× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9121 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.6737 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6983 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.7551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9315 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 162 Micronesia (country) -0.7768 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 163 Cameroon -0.7869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 164 Algeria -0.7891 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 166 Tajikistan -0.8038 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 167 Mali -0.8083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 168 Madagascar -0.8333 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Suriname
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0324 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0374 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1239 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0109 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1239 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1088 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0507 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2131 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6104 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0594 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Suriname?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Suriname was -0.7955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was -0.3409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Suriname rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Suriname ranks 165th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is down 37.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.