Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mozambique
Mozambique: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.7604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Mozambique, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Mozambique stood at -0.7604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 9.5% on the previous year and down 24.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Mozambique peaked at -0.2253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002 and was at its lowest, -0.7819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2021.
Mozambique ranks 160th of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.7647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.4621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -39.6% |
| 2000 | -0.235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -49.1% |
| 2002 | -0.2253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.1% |
| 2003 | -0.3067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +36.1% |
| 2004 | -0.4916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +60.3% |
| 2005 | -0.5604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.0% |
| 2006 | -0.5176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.6% |
| 2007 | -0.4744 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.3% |
| 2008 | -0.4016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.3% |
| 2009 | -0.3863 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.8% |
| 2010 | -0.5202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +34.7% |
| 2011 | -0.5414 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.1% |
| 2012 | -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.0% |
| 2013 | -0.538 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.3% |
| 2014 | -0.5498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2015 | -0.6105 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.0% |
| 2016 | -0.6698 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.7% |
| 2017 | -0.6562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2018 | -0.6983 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.4% |
| 2019 | -0.6887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2020 | -0.7362 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.9% |
| 2021 | -0.7819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.2% |
| 2022 | -0.7488 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.2% |
| 2023 | -0.7143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.6% |
| 2024 | -0.6942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.8% |
| 2025 | -0.7604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.5% |
Mozambique compared with similar countries
- Mozambique's -0.7604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for low income countries, which is -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 69% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Mozambique's -0.7604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.3999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.5944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6983 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.7393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 157 Marshall Islands -0.7313 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 158 East Timor -0.7324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 159 Angola -0.7439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 161 Niger -0.7658 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 162 Micronesia (country) -0.7768 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 163 Cameroon -0.7869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Mozambique
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2808 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 9.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 27.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.53 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Mozambique?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Mozambique was -0.7604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was -0.2253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.7819 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2021.
- How does Mozambique rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Mozambique ranks 160th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is down 24.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.