Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in South Korea
South Korea: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in South Korea, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
South Korea recorded 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for regulatory quality - governance estimate in 2025.
The figure is up 4.4% on the previous year and down 0.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in South Korea peaked at 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.2176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
South Korea ranks 32nd of 206 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in South Korea, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.3433 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.2176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -36.6% |
| 2000 | 0.4791 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +120.2% |
| 2002 | 0.6771 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +41.3% |
| 2003 | 0.5932 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.4% |
| 2004 | 0.787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +32.7% |
| 2005 | 0.8531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.4% |
| 2006 | 0.7906 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.3% |
| 2007 | 0.9536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.6% |
| 2008 | 0.7126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.3% |
| 2009 | 0.7699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.1% |
| 2010 | 0.8301 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.8% |
| 2011 | 0.932 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.3% |
| 2012 | 0.9288 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2013 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.3% |
| 2014 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2016 | 0.9738 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.0% |
| 2017 | 0.963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.9691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2019 | 0.9423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.8% |
| 2020 | 0.9406 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2021 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.5% |
| 2022 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.9% |
| 2023 | 0.9529 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.2% |
| 2024 | 0.9606 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2025 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.4% |
South Korea compared with similar countries
- South Korea's 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.9078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.1× the median. (74 countries reporting)
- South Korea's 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is -0.0624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (34 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in South Korea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | +120.2% | 0.2176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4791 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2804 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3433 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.7351 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4791 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.9554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8301 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9406 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near South Korea
More reference data data for South Korea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9638 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9281 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2074 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in South Korea?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in South Korea was 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in South Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2022.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in South Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does South Korea rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- South Korea ranks 32nd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in South Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this South Korea data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.