Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Belgium
Belgium: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Belgium, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belgium is 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% on the previous year and down 1.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belgium peaked at 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002 and was at its lowest, 0.9817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2014.
Belgium ranks 22nd of 206 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Belgium, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
| 2000 | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.2% |
| 2002 | 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.5% |
| 2003 | 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2004 | 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.0% |
| 2005 | 1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2006 | 1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
| 2007 | 1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2008 | 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.7% |
| 2009 | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.8% |
| 2010 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.5% |
| 2011 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.3% |
| 2012 | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.5% |
| 2013 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.7% |
| 2014 | 0.9817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.4% |
| 2015 | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.6% |
| 2016 | 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.8% |
| 2017 | 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.9% |
| 2018 | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2019 | 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.3% |
| 2020 | 1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.1% |
| 2021 | 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2022 | 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2023 | 1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.0% |
| 2024 | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.2% |
| 2025 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
Belgium compared with similar countries
- Belgium's 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.9078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.3× the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Belgium's 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.6107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 2.0× the median. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Belgium
- 19 Lithuania 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 20 Japan 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 21 Germany 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 23 United Arab Emirates 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 24 Israel 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 25 United States Virgin Islands 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Belgium
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9298 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1382 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7526 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belgium?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Belgium was 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Belgium?
- The highest recorded value was 1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Belgium?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014.
- How does Belgium rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Belgium ranks 22nd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Belgium?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belgium data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.