Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in France
France: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index was 8 0-10 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in France, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
France recorded 8 0-10 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in France peaked at 8 0-10 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 8 0-10, in 2005.
France ranks 32nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in France, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 8 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 8 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8 0-10 | 8 0-10 | 8 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 8 0-10 | 8 0-10 | 8 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near France
- 32 India 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Mexico 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Afghanistan 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Australia 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Bahrain 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Belgium 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Burundi 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Canada 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Chile 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Djibouti 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Egypt 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Estonia 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Republic of Korea 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Oman 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Rwanda 8 0-10 compare
- 32 South Africa 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Sri Lanka 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Sweden 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Tajikistan 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Uzbekistan 8 0-10 compare
- 32 Zimbabwe 8 0-10 compare
More reference data data for France
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 22.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 22.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 18.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 11.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 14.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 106.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 15.3 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in France?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in France was 8 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in France?
- The highest recorded value was 8 0-10 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in France?
- The lowest recorded value was 8 0-10 in 2005.
- How does France rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- France ranks 32nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index rising or falling in France?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this France data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.