Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Colombia
Colombia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index was 9 0-10 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Colombia, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Colombia is 9 0-10, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Colombia peaked at 9 0-10 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 9 0-10, in 2005.
That places Colombia 14th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Colombia, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 9 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 9 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9 0-10 | 9 0-10 | 9 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 9 0-10 | 9 0-10 | 9 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Colombia
- 14 Albania 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Cyprus 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Georgia 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Greece 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Ireland 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Kazakhstan 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Kosovo 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Lebanon 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Morocco 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Peru 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Philippines 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Romania 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Saudi Arabia 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Taiwan 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Türkiye 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Ukraine 9 0-10 compare
- 14 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 9 0-10 compare
More reference data data for Colombia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4113 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 61.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 94.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Colombia?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Colombia was 9 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Colombia?
- The highest recorded value was 9 0-10 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Colombia?
- The lowest recorded value was 9 0-10 in 2005.
- How does Colombia rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- Colombia ranks 14th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index rising or falling in Colombia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Colombia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.