Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Austria
Austria: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index was 5 0-10 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Austria, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
Austria recorded 5 0-10 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Austria peaked at 5 0-10 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 5 0-10, in 2005.
That places Austria 113th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Austria, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 5 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 0-10 | 5 0-10 | 5 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 5 0-10 | 5 0-10 | 5 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Austria
- 113 Brazil 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Costa Rica 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Croatia 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Dominican Republic 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Germany 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Guyana 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Kuwait 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Latvia 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Montenegro 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Mozambique 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Namibia 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Papua New Guinea 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Samoa 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Slovenia 5 0-10 compare
- 113 East Timor 5 0-10 compare
- 113 Vanuatu 5 0-10 compare
More reference data data for Austria
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6222 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2597 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.08 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Austria?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Austria was 5 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Austria?
- The highest recorded value was 5 0-10 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Austria?
- The lowest recorded value was 5 0-10 in 2005.
- How does Austria rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- Austria ranks 113th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index rising or falling in Austria?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Austria data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.