Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Suriname

Suriname: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 10 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
10
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
183rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
10
in 2005
All-time low
10
in 2005
Years of data
15
2005–2019

Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Suriname, 2005–2019

02468102005201220192005: 102006: 102007: 102008: 102009: 102010: 102011: 102012: 102013: 102014: 102015: 102016: 102017: 102018: 102019: 10

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Suriname recorded 10 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Suriname peaked at 10 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 10, in 2005.

Suriname ranks 183rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Suriname, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score in Suriname, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 10
2006 10 +0.0%
2007 10 +0.0%
2008 10 +0.0%
2009 10 +0.0%
2010 10 +0.0%
2011 10 +0.0%
2012 10 +0.0%
2013 10 +0.0%
2014 10 +0.0%
2015 10 +0.0%
2016 10 +0.0%
2017 10 +0.0%
2018 10 +0.0%
2019 10 +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 10 10 10 5
2010s 10 10 10 10

Countries ranked near Suriname

  1. 183 Bolivia 10 compare
  2. 183 Cape Verde 10 compare
  3. 183 Nicaragua 10 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Suriname

All data for Suriname →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Suriname?
Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Suriname was 10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Suriname?
The highest recorded value was 10 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Suriname?
The lowest recorded value was 10 in 2005.
How does Suriname rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
Suriname ranks 183rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Suriname?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Suriname data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Suriname. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-disclosure-index-0-10-score/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-disclosure-index-0-10-score/suriname/">Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Suriname</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,865 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.