Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Grenada
Grenada: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 40 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Grenada, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Grenada is 40, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Grenada peaked at 40 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 40, in 2005.
Grenada ranks 130th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Grenada, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 40 | — |
| 2006 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 40 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 40 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 40 | 40 | 5 |
| 2010s | 40 | 40 | 40 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Grenada
- 130 Algeria 40 compare
- 130 Angola 40 compare
- 130 Antigua and Barbuda 40 compare
- 130 Bhutan 40 compare
- 130 Brunei 40 compare
- 130 Dominica 40 compare
- 130 Iraq 40 compare
- 130 Jamaica 40 compare
- 130 Jordan 40 compare
- 130 Liberia 40 compare
- 130 Libya 40 compare
- 130 Malawi 40 compare
- 130 Myanmar 40 compare
- 130 Netherlands 40 compare
- 130 Panama 40 compare
- 130 Seychelles 40 compare
- 130 Saint Kitts and Nevis 40 compare
- 130 Saint Lucia 40 compare
- 130 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 40 compare
- 130 Trinidad and Tobago 40 compare
- 130 Zambia 40 compare
More reference data data for Grenada
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0023 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0047 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0076 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0034 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0219 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0331 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Grenada?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Grenada was 40 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Grenada?
- The highest recorded value was 40 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Grenada?
- The lowest recorded value was 40 in 2005.
- How does Grenada rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Grenada ranks 130th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Grenada?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Grenada data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.