Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) was 80 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Afghanistan, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Afghanistan recorded 80 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 700.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Afghanistan peaked at 80 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 10, in 2005.
Afghanistan ranks 32nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 10 | — |
| 2006 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 80 | +700.0% |
| 2019 | 80 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 24 | 10 | 80 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
- 32 India 80 compare
- 32 Mexico 80 compare
- 32 Australia 80 compare
- 32 Bahrain 80 compare
- 32 Belgium 80 compare
- 32 Burundi 80 compare
- 32 Canada 80 compare
- 32 Chile 80 compare
- 32 Djibouti 80 compare
- 32 Egypt 80 compare
- 32 Estonia 80 compare
- 32 France 80 compare
- 32 Republic of Korea 80 compare
- 32 Oman 80 compare
- 32 Rwanda 80 compare
- 32 South Africa 80 compare
- 32 Sri Lanka 80 compare
- 32 Sweden 80 compare
- 32 Tajikistan 80 compare
- 32 Uzbekistan 80 compare
- 32 Zimbabwe 80 compare
More reference data data for Afghanistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8991 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4362 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.847 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 26.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.38 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Afghanistan?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) in Afghanistan was 80 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 80 in 2018.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 10 in 2005.
- How does Afghanistan rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10)?
- Afghanistan ranks 32nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index (0-10) rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 700.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.