Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in France

France: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index was 30 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
30
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
136th
of 191 countries
All-time high
30
in 2005
All-time low
30
in 2005
Years of data
15
2005–2019

Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in France, 2005–2019

01020302005201220192005: 302006: 302007: 302008: 302009: 302010: 302011: 302012: 302013: 302014: 302015: 302016: 302017: 302018: 302019: 30

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in France is 30, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in France peaked at 30 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 30, in 2005.

France ranks 136th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in France, year by year

Annual values for Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score in France, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 30
2006 30 +0.0%
2007 30 +0.0%
2008 30 +0.0%
2009 30 +0.0%
2010 30 +0.0%
2011 30 +0.0%
2012 30 +0.0%
2013 30 +0.0%
2014 30 +0.0%
2015 30 +0.0%
2016 30 +0.0%
2017 30 +0.0%
2018 30 +0.0%
2019 30 +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 30 30 30 5
2010s 30 30 30 10

Countries ranked near France

  1. 136 Egypt 30 compare
  2. 136 Estonia 30 compare
  3. 136 Haiti 30 compare
  4. 136 Mauritania 30 compare
  5. 136 Tonga 30 compare
  6. 136 Uzbekistan 30 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for France

All data for France →

Frequently asked questions

What is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in France?
Protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in France was 30 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in France?
The highest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in France?
The lowest recorded value was 30 in 2005.
How does France rank for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
France ranks 136th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index rising or falling in France?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this France data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in France. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-director-liability-index-0-10-score/france/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/protecting-minority-investors-extent-of-director-liability-index-0-10-score/france/">Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in France</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,865 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.